The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
No, 4 km on the TT bike are not worth the bike switch.Will they attempt to do a bike change?
Tell me you work weekends without telling me you work weekendsI know we’re not supposed to like any route but I like this one enough. Is it perfect? Of course not, I’d like some cobbles and longer individual time trials. I know some people would like tougher mountain stages. Everyone has their wants but this route is pretty good given the fact they had to go back north at don’t point.
Out of all the complaints about modern cycling, the one that confuses me the most is "youtube cycling" "TikTok cycling" or whatever accusation you want that this is due to short attention spans.Fairly standard ASO fare of the last few years tbh. The flat to rolling stages are pretty decent for what they are, the mountain stages are lazy and uninspiring, with the whole thing seemingly tailored for Youtube Cycling, so you can catch more or less everything you need to see in the last 45m of any given stage. There is, however, not a great deal to be genuinely angry at, the only complete abortion is the pacing leading to abysmal weekend stages, where the best and most decisive weekend stage looks likely to be the one to Boulogne-sur-Mer, but there's no stage that really captures the imagination and fills you with any level of anticipation for any reason other than the prestige inherent from being the Tour de France.
Sure.Out of all the complaints about modern cycling, the one that confuses me the most is "youtube cycling" "TikTok cycling" or whatever accusation you want that this is due to short attention spans.
Like you guys realize that we broadcast every KM of every stage now right, and that broadcasts in the 80s might *literally* just consist of the last 45 minutes
And 2 km between Glandon and Madeleine12 km flat before La Plagne15 km flat before Col de la Loze
![]()
Given that long valley sections are the geographical feature of the French mountain ranges that diminish action from 2-3 mountains out from the finish the parcours this year does seem better in that regard as less risk of the GC group swelling enormously with domestiques getting back in.12 km flat before La Plagne15 km flat before Col de la Loze
![]()
UAE will really miss the rouleur who paced Glandon when they get to Madeleine...less risk of the GC group swelling enormously with domestiques getting back in.
Yeah great combo! Doesn't matter because of the rest of the stage, but sure.And 2 km between Glandon and MadeleineI think this is a good route
![]()
I don't want 21 MTFs. I'd like 0, really.One of my favorite parts to these Tour reveal days is watching fans that think there should be insane mountain stages complain while those of us who love time trialing are supposed to be happy with anything over 30 k of total time trialing. It’s like, come on, I am sorry you only get 6 or 7 mountain top finishes and you’re upset that there aren’t tougher mountain combos on stages meanwhile the 60 k individual time trial is a thing of the distant past.
One of my favorite parts to these Tour reveal days is watching fans that think there should be insane mountain stages complain while those of us who love time trialing are supposed to be happy with anything over 30 k of total time trialing. It’s like, come on, I am sorry you only get 6 or 7 mountain top finishes and you’re upset that there aren’t tougher mountain combos on stages meanwhile the 60 k individual time trial is a thing of the distant past.
I get the weekend point but don’t the French take a good portion of the month off? I am not sure they’re as concerned about that aspect as the rest of us. But I totally get and agree with that point. Midweek mountain stages are tough- I was exhausted watching the Vuelta this year.This route honestly isn't as bad as first feared, my big issue is the weekend stages. I know it's easy for me to say as I'm not designing the route, but 5 of the weekend stages will are potentially bunch sprints, which just isn't good enough. Most of us who have full time jobs only really have the weekend to really sit down for a few hours and watch. The weekend stages are always the most viewed, and over the last few years ASO have been pretty good with placing interesting stages on weekends.
Probably true, but for a business point of view, you want your more interesting stages to be the most viewed, to show off the product, and get more interest in the sport.I get the weekend point but don’t the French take a good portion of the month off? I am not sure they’re as concerned about that aspect as the rest of us. But I totally get and agree with that point. Midweek mountain stages are tough- I was exhausted watching the Vuelta this year.
Could just as well just have a two or three/four (for the usual processional Champs stage at the end and maybe precede with a short ITT for 1st stage) because that will be the extent of the competition they want for the whole GT. Designing a route that they want to only be fought over for essentially Two Stages is an affront to the long history of the Race... IMO and you can take my opinion here in California and plus 5 dollars and buy a gallon of gas approximately. That Blatant idiocy of making the race based on two stages makes me very unhappy.I see Prudhomme has said that he expects it to be close until the last two Alp stages. There you go, designed for no GC action until late on.
https://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur...ance-2025-on-a-traque-la-moindre-cote/1517012
english version at https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...es-for-a-far-more-open-tour-de-france-in-2025
I haven't seen the parcours, but I'm giving it a 4 out of 10.