It's crazy just how much everyones first thought about the first week this year is "just let the big gc players get through it unharmed"
It's crazy just how much everyones first thought about the first week this year is "just let the big gc players get through it unharmed"
While I do prefer a prologue, it is indeed quite fun (and a bit nostalgic) watching sprinters wearing the yellow jersey. Unfortunately we won't see the jersey at the pointy end of stage 2 I think.Although I prefer a prologue, I honestly don't mind a flat stage to open the race. It's a rare chance for sprinters to take yellow, and if you have to have so many sprint stages each year, I prefer one of them to be stage 1 since you're just psyched that the Tour is starting, and I actually think it's a beautiful way of getting the race started.
Why not take GC times at 5km?
+ award bonus seconds at the finish line
+ add a "Roglic zone" from 10km to 5km (time freeze for crash/mech)
Everybody is safe and happy!
Better seeing GC favorites soft pedaling because they don't need to sprint instead of seeing them soft pedaling banged up and bloody.
Wout van Aert?Belgian horse wins a historic maillot jaune
There's going to be some cracking yellows being dished out between Trek and Alpecin, wall to wall arseholes going head to head, maybe if we are really lucky we get a Mark Clattenburg style ref looking to make a name for himself dishing out the reds.Who'll get the first yellow card? Someone forgetting not to celebrate a teammates win, is my guess.
If Johnny Trek's train get it right, there'll be no stopping him.
Or sprinter stages after the first block of mountains - seemed to me like they just couldn't bother anymore and some random breakaways just sailed away again and again on very flat days until Paris. Nowadays these stages would just be controlled unless its after the second block of mountains where stuff can happen.While I do prefer a prologue, it is indeed quite fun (and a bit nostalgic) watching sprinters wearing the yellow jersey. Unfortunately we won't see the jersey at the pointy end of stage 2 I think.
The mid-2000s Tour routes were obviously not perfect, but seeing the yellow jersey often change from one sprinter to the next during the first week was quite fun despite the flat sprint-fest. I miss the 20 second time bonuses. Also the occasional first week 20 minute breakaway made for a fun middle part of the race, seeing those guys slowly dwindle away from the GC standings. But with almost all teams being so strong and ambitious these days, those don't really happen anymore.
My main hope for stage 1 is no serious crashes.
Good point. I don't know about crash statistics.you'll make the stages far more prone to crashes.
Crashes became more common once the UCI changed from a 1km to a 3km zone. All that did was result in longer flat out sprinting, putting riders in the red for longer, leading to more crashes.
See how few crashes there were when it was the 1km rule
Good point. I don't know about crash statistics.
But this is exactly the point. The current 3k rule is fatally flawed because it only applies in case of crash or mechanical. The GC guys have to be in front until the finish to avoid splits! So: take GC times 5k or 8k or whatever before the finish (before the sprint trains go full berserk), and let the GC guys sit up and make space for pure sprinters.
Or: allow huge splits on these flat stages ( 20? 30? Secs) to be given same GC times.
Current rules are enough to allow GC riders to take it easy.Or: allow huge splits on these flat stages ( 20? 30? Secs) to be given same GC times.
Current rules are enough to allow GC riders to take it easy.
This corner of France is relatively densely populated in its rural areas, so the best you get is two-kilometre sections that are completely exposed or five-kilometre sections that get interrupted by a line of houses for 500 metres and then two big farms for 200 metres each. And even of those, there aren't that many.Early wind forecasts predict quite a lot of wind and the direction seems perfect for a whole day of cross/cross-tailwind except for the first 50km.
Are there enough open roads to actually have a realistic chance of splits/echelons or will it only make the stage even more nervous?
I think some reasons were that some of those stages were a little bit hilly at least, and the sprinters of those days (bar Zabel, but he never had his team really control stages for him anyway) were usually extremely non-durable for stuff like that (McEwen f.ex.). Also the average domestiques of the sprinters were much further from the level of the domestiques nowadays, so if the breakaway had some strong barodeurs it was a lot of work. Add to that that the stages where the sprinters couldn't be bothered were often long or very hot.Or sprinter stages after the first block of mountains - seemed to me like they just couldn't bother anymore and some random breakaways just sailed away again and again on very flat days until Paris. Nowadays these stages would just be controlled unless its after the second block of mountains where stuff can happen.
No chance at all, break will be caught with 30-40km's to go. Let them get those last KOM points, and reel them back in.No chance for the break, right? I mean the pure sprinters will be so effing jazzed for a chance to wear yellow that they will make sure the break is caught. Maybe a poll on how many km remain when the break is caught would work.