Everyone and their mothers know Lioran happened because Pogacar didnt eat/drink properly. That was him bonking.After having outsprinted him last year in Le Lioran, I'd say just holding Pogacar's wheel is going backwards
Everyone and their mothers know Lioran happened because Pogacar didnt eat/drink properly. That was him bonking.After having outsprinted him last year in Le Lioran, I'd say just holding Pogacar's wheel is going backwards
For the record, I don't like any one dimensional sprinter for the reasons that are implicit in the stats. They do far less yet get far more opportunities than any other type of rider in cycling. I look at the effort and work that Ben Healy did yesterday to win a single stage, yet a sprinter will get 6/7/8 opportunities just sitting in the bunch. It's not the same thing at all.It's just a stage record lol.
You can decide to not care because it favors sprinters, but denying it's validity or suggesting alternate ways of counting because you don't like the rider who has the record is just silly.
I don't like Pogacar, may I please suggest another way of determining the overall winner of f
Wouts magical 3 discipline winsFor the record, I don't like any one dimensional sprinter for the reasons that are implicit in the stats. They do far less yet get far more opportunities than any other type of rider in cycling. I look at the effort and work that Ben Healy did yesterday to win a single stage, yet a sprinter will get 6/7/8 opportunities just sitting in the bunch. It's not the same thing at all.
For the record, riders winning 4 or more sprint stages has bern done 11 times in the 21st century by 5 different riders. Include 98/99, its goes out to 7 riders. In the same period, only one non-sprinter has won 4 stages in a single discipline, Pogacar with 4 mountain stages last year.
Believe me when I say I rate that achievement by WVA higher than any numbers of wins by any sprinter. Outside of GC guys, I consider that to be the biggest achievement of the 21st century Tour history, and I ain't a WVA fan.Wouts magical 3 discipline wins
I just asked my mother...Everyone and their mothers know Lioran happened because Pogacar didnt eat/drink properly. That was him bonking.
I guess this implies you are not Everyone.I just asked my mother...
...she didn't know.
more than likely, he will be ,what 30, in 2028Are you really thinking Pogacar will win the Tour until 2028? Anything can happen, look to Froome 2017 or even Contador 2009.
I'd imagine he'll probably do a fair amount of crying himself, it just looks so painful.What's his usual sleeping pattern like? Will a screaming baby wake him up?
Sprinters have other problems that limits their ability to win 30 stages, otherwise the top of that ranking would have more sprinters but it's only Cavendish. Sprinters have short primes, burn out quickly, and usually have smaller margins of dominance over the rest of the field.For the record, I don't like any one dimensional sprinter for the reasons that are implicit in the stats. They do far less yet get far more opportunities than any other type of rider in cycling. I look at the effort and work that Ben Healy did yesterday to win a single stage, yet a sprinter will get 6/7/8 opportunities just sitting in the bunch. It's not the same thing at all.
For the record, riders winning 4 or more sprint stages has bern done 11 times in the 21st century by 5 different riders. Include 98/99, its goes out to 7 riders. In the same period, only one non-sprinter has won 4 stages in a single discipline, Pogacar with 4 mountain stages last year.