The Hitch said:
Umm what 2 mountains were those?
Alpe d'Huez. Andy kept looking at Cadel. Absolute reversal of 2008. Cadel had to set pace and lost out. 2011, Cadel is in the box seat and just chilling with the Schlecks. Andy kept gesturing at him to set pace and he didn't. Probably because the day before (might have been 2 days)...the stage where Andy won, Cadel pulled the entire peloton up the climb. Every major GC guy cracked. Cadel did all the work. When he did that I knew he was a shoe in to win. Sure it was one Schleck that day but they didn't beat him. Andy got some time from a breakaway earlier. On the climbs, Cadel was as quick as him.
Put it this way. Apart from Andy's stage win where he broke away early, there was no stage in the Tour where they annihilated Cadel as a team. Given they are climbers, they needed to make moves every chance they could. Alpe d'Huez showed they didn't have enough gas left to attack, hence trying to get Cadel to set pace and potentially blow out. Cadel was wise enough to simply ignore them.
I wasn't implying Cadel annihilated the Schleck's in some epic climbing duel. I was implying that the lack of Schleck moves indicated that Cadel was equal more or less to them in the mountains and thus the lack of attacks indicate they didn't have the ammunition to punch on.
As for Menchov. I agree. People under rate Menchov far too much. He's too iffy though. He fluctuates all the time. Having his bank account frozen last year can't have helped. Comparison to Nibali? Nibali, ignoring the last Vuelta has been more stable in recent years. But when Dennis is on, he's on and can do some stellar things in a GT. Definitely on paper, he's higher calibre, but not by a massive margin.