Ninety5rpm said:
Just curious as to what is the basis for this, especially considering LA's tour de suisse performance.
I'm really curious why everyone seems to be overstating his Tour de Suisse performance. He didn't look great climbing (gapped on the Queen stage, but salvaged a top 10
on the downhill); was something like
27th at the top of the climb of the prologue/opening TT (finished 44th, but didn't push on the downhill portion because of the rain); was
23rd at the top of the long drag to the top of the final TT. He finished 1'09" down and 11th in that TT (
gained time on the downhill). But he only beat Frank Schleck by 5 seconds!
He finished 2nd because the 6 other riders ahead of him entering the final TT were terrible time trialist (or produced terrible TTs save Frank Schleck).
Gesink (from 1st to 5th (lost 2'19" (40th))
Uran (from 2nd to 7th (lost 1'56" (28th))
Morabito (from 3rd to 4th (lost 1'39" (21st))
F. Schleck (from 4th to 1st) (lost 1'14" (13th))
J. Rod (from 5th to 9th) (lost 2'19" (41st))
Matteo Carrara (from 6th to 15th) (lost 2'55 (59th))
So I'm not dogging his performance, because this is what stages are all about (being the fastest through the course). But I just don't understand why everyone thinks his form was so great. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't the kind of performance to put fear in the hearts of competitors (IMO).
His power is good (but then it was good last year (see the TTT--he was taking monster pulls)). His climbing continues to be his achilles heel in my opinion (see where he regained time at the Tour de Suisse). And he's not raced for the win on a MTF since . . . Verbier.
So again, what is the basis for being confident in his climbing ability since he hasn't shown it all year? (Serious question)