hatcher said:Exciting time trial again though. They've been more exciting than the mountain stages so far this year. I say more time trials, less mountains.
What mountain stages?
hatcher said:Exciting time trial again though. They've been more exciting than the mountain stages so far this year. I say more time trials, less mountains.
burning said:Actually winning this TT gives 106 world points so it worths more than a monument too
Those top-10s were thanks to breakaways.hrotha said:Ok, he, who's supposed to be a time-trialist who can climb and who has been top 10 in Tour and Vuelta, did great today. Go Luisle.
roundabout said:40 seconds faster.
Errm.
With a mechanical.
Edit, corrected to 1 second.
Phew.
theyoungest said:Talansky showed little recovery ability last year though. In the last days of the Vuelta he could barely follow the peloton. It's nice if in the last week of the Tour you can still ride a bit
Then again, this is an absolutely incredible performance, so whatever they've done to him over the winter, it has worked.
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:I know that, and I questioned and said it unlikely when he said it back in February, and Talansky being talented is no news, those of us who followed him in his espoirs days new then already he was going to be a massively talented rider and already last year he was producing real quality ITT performaces rather then climbing ones (I always said he was gonna bigger then TJVG) but this course is no indication of the tour lol, and he is not gonna be challenging the head of state at the TDF at this point of his career anyway, despite what your ignorance leads you to believe.
hatcher said:Exciting time trial again though. They've been more exciting than the mountain stages so far this year. I say more time trials, less mountains.
Libertine Seguros said:The idea is balance. If the time trials are long enough, the TT guys will just control everything else. If the time trials aren't long enough, the mountain guys won't attack.
So far this year, we haven't had a single balanced stage race parcours. They have pretty much all sucked.
Froome19 said:Whatever you may think, look at the previous stages and you will see that Talansky has been one of the strongest riders consistently in the mountains.
He has shown brilliant potential and ability in TT but I believe he also has it there when it comes to climbing and so does Vaughters, and anyway whats the fun in not hyping riders a bit OTT?
cycladianpirate said:The CN forum whines about the parcours again!!
I fancy that the truth of the matter is that you secretly yearn for the Armstrong/Ullrich days and all that entails...![]()
He didn't gain 20 minutes in those breakaways I don't think, but you can substitute top 10 for top 12 or whatever he'd have been without them. The point still stands. In theory, he can TT very well. He can climb. He's a very good descender and strong on rolling terrain. He was the race leader. But I guess beating Clement by fractions of a second and not losing too much to the likes of Weening was brilliant.theyoungest said:Those top-10s were thanks to breakaways.
gilbertador said:I would argue Tirreno Adriatico was perfectly balanced even with the route change and Basque country wasnt bad either. I dont understand the hate for paris nice it was tense and enjoyable for sure.
Romandie and Catalunya have been utter failiures though
hatcher said:Exciting time trial again though. They've been more exciting than the mountain stages so far this year. I say more time trials, less mountains.
hrotha said:Actually, yes, totally horrible time by Lulu.
Evans was 40th, 1.45 downmovingtarget said:Another sold ride by Porte. I noticed Evans did not make the top 20. How far back was he ?
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:for the sake of entertainment yep.
but really, surely no once can defend this romandie course, the stages were a joke.
