Dekker_Tifosi said:The difference is between the actual guys who CONTESTED it.
Not finished outside the top 20 like Sanchez
Face it, we are never going to agree on this one. The field was stronger in Suisse. The riding of Vandenbroeck in Dauphine was unimpressive for me. Period.
You're trying to argue two sides of the same coin here and it just doesn't work.
The top 4 in the TDS were DNF, 23rd, 50th and 51st in the GC at the Tour. The next two after Gesink were 137th and DNS.
At the DL, the top 3 were 43rd, 1st, DNS. The next 3 after VDB were DNS, 88th and 28th.
Niether race had guys fighting for the win who were high up at the Tour the following month... aside from Gesink, VDB and Contador.
The two races had similar fields... aside from a top Tour guy (in Contador) was fighting for the win in one while no top Tour guy was in the other.
I really have no problem with people thinking Gesink is better. I think he's better too in a physical sense... he just has a greater tendency to make dumb mistakes. But trying to degrade VDB's results and prop up Gesink's by calling the DL field weak and the TDS field strong when both were very similar just seems like a weak flame attempt.
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
		
		 
		
		 
 
		 
 
		 
		
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter Instagram
Instagram