Tour of Belgium, 25th -29th of May - 2.HC

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 2, 2009
5,596
71
17,580
I have to say, looking at the profiles of the stages (you can see an overview of them here) one is struck by how much of a sprint fest this is. They want Tommeke to win the GC this year.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Moondance said:
I have to say, looking at the profiles of the stages (you can see an overview of them here) one is struck by how much of a sprint fest this is. They want Tommeke to win the GC this year.

2 stages that won't end in a mass sprint and a prologue.

It's ok. Besides, Tommeke can do a lot more than sprinting.
 
Dec 27, 2010
6,674
1
0
Moondance said:
I have to say, looking at the profiles of the stages (you can see an overview of them here) one is struck by how much of a sprint fest this is. They want Tommeke to win the GC this year.

flat ≠ sprint, least of all in Belgium ;)
 
Jul 2, 2009
5,596
71
17,580
El Pistolero said:
2 stages that won't end in a mass sprint and a prologue.

It's ok. Besides, Tommeke can do a lot more than sprinting.

Stage 2: The Kemmelberg is a nasty piece of work, of course, and one hopes that someone like Gilbert will try to make use of it to launch himself on the offensive. But it's also a good 20 kms from the finish. Stage two could very easily still finish in a 60-80 ma group sprint, if there isn't a motivated (group of)rider(s) ahead, or if there is a very motivated team leading the peloton.


Stage 3: Will be a disappointment. Obviously the 600m uphill finish will mean we get a different group of people sprinting FTW, but looking at how the stage develops, this could also be a serious dud of a stage. Certainly if they're hoping for the ferocious Col du Mont Rigi to do some serious peloton rupturing, they've got another thing coming. The stage goes over the Mur de Huy... So why don't they finish there and do the third-rate climbs earlier?

I've followed the Tour of Belgium for many years, and this could very easily be the worst parcours I've ever seen from them.

That's not to say that the direction of the Tour of Belgium is the organisation that sacrifices difficulty of route, presumably expecting them to get more and bigger names at the start, but I certainly think they're the most glaring ones. There are so many fantastic stages you could construct, snaking through and across the most legendary places, and climbs, and cities in cycling.... And yet this year we'll have to content ourselves with watching the 'spectacle' on the Col du Mont Rigi.
 
Apr 12, 2009
2,364
0
0
You're absolutely right.

A proposal from me:

Stage 1) Echelon/sprint stage. Start in Bruges, end somewhere at the coast
Stage 2) Start in Kortrijk or so, first Rodeberg etc. in 'Het heuvelland', small trip to France, go arounde Lille, include Pavés de Cysoing à Bourghelles, Bourghelles à Wannehain, Camphin-en-Pévèle & le Carrefour de l'Arbre. Back to Belgium, and end in Ronse (include a hill nearby the finish)
Stage 3) Time Trial: Oudenaarde-Zottegem, with Wolvenberg, Kergate(Mater), Haaghoek, Leberg & Berendries.
Stage 4) Ardennes stage. Do some famous hills of LBL and FW + some unknown.
Stage 5) Stage in Brabant, some hills, end on a avenue in Brussels -> majestic sprint.
 
May 14, 2009
61
4
8,685
Graeme Brown is attending this race, but isn't there a rule that you can't quit one race (Giro d'Italia) and start in another race (Tour of Belgium) as long as the first race(Giro) is still being ridden?

Have they changed this? I'm pretty sure i've heard of this rule before.
 
Sep 25, 2009
1,942
0
0
Nyssinator said:
Graeme Brown is attending this race, but isn't there a rule that you can't quit one race (Giro d'Italia) and start in another race (Tour of Belgium) as long as the first race(Giro) is still being ridden?

Have they changed this? I'm pretty sure i've heard of this rule before.

He didn't quit the race
 
May 14, 2009
61
4
8,685
The Sheep said:
He didn't quit the race

Ok, so the difference is in that he didn't make the time cut and was kicked out of the race? If he had quit he wouldn't been allowed to start Tour of Belgium?
 
May 12, 2010
1,998
0
0
Nyssinator said:
Ok, so the difference is in that he didn't make the time cut and was kicked out of the race? If he had quit he wouldn't been allowed to start Tour of Belgium?

I believe the rule is that you need permission from the organisers of the race you abandoned to start in a new race.
 
Jul 2, 2009
5,596
71
17,580
Dekker_Tifosi said:
I just noticed TGM is at the starting line. I wonder why this race?

I guess Rabo wants him to be ready to compete for the GC in the Tour of Switzerland, and they want him to get some extra training kms?

Perhaps.
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
Maybe Mollema needs more races to be in shape, and that's why they chose a different route.
Gesink always rides very little races and has a lot of training blocks. Mollema seems to be doing the opposite.
 
Jul 2, 2009
5,596
71
17,580
Been watching for 45 mins now or so, and not a single person has broken into the Top-10 since.... A little unusual.

Are there wind issues or something?

EDIT: Ask and ye shall receive... Roelandts finishes 8th so far. Still..
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
Nice bit of chauvinism from the Sporza-commentators.

Langeveld takes the best time of a Belgian. Their reply? "The wind must have come down"

Because yes, it's impossible Langeveld would take the best time from Debuscherre under normal conditions??