Tour of Denmark 2025 (12/8 - 16/8)

Page 11 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I just noticed that they are riding two different hills today, both called the exact same thing (Golfbakken = The Golf Hill") in different parts of the country :D

True! Both are leading up to a golf course. With the "Vejle" climb being the tougher of the two.

golfbakken-svanninge.png

Golfbakken, first climb on the route.

ibaekvej-ibaek.png

Golfbakken, second climb on the route.
 
True! Both are leading up to a golf course. With the "Vejle" climb being the tougher of the two.

golfbakken-svanninge.png

Golfbakken, first climb on the route.

ibaekvej-ibaek.png

Golfbakken, second climb on the route.
An oddity with both those climbs in one stage. Having said that, this type of names is not my cup of tea at all. Too provincial. Why not just say "Bjergevej" and "Ibækvej". Besides, nicknames for climbs instead of geographical references are bad when things change. Like the so-called "Blue Horse" climb near Vejle. The firm "Blue Horse" has moved.
 
The old bridge they are on now is dedicated to trains, bicycles and pedestrians BTW - no cars are allowed on it on normal days - they go across the newer bridge - so all the tarmac you see on the bridge is everyday bike lanes.

The old bridge is from 1935, the newer one from 1970.

(115K to go for those watching the stage later)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
The latter have a governmental connection to Denmark and are thus closer connected to Denmark than Finland is. The southern part of the Scandinavian peninsula was Danish until the 17th century. Currently there is no direct geographical connection that explains the status of Denmark as Scandinavian.
 
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
Scandinavia is not the same as the Scandinavian Peninsula. I wouldn't include the Insular North Germanic-speaking countries in Scandinavia - though it would be practical to have an easy way to refer to all North Germanic-speaking countries... Nordic Countries also includes Finland, of course.
 
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
Inhabitants of Als and North Jutlandic Island also consider themselves Jutes, despite not being part of the peninsula. Some things are not understood if only understood narrowly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: E_F_
Scandinavia is not the same as the Scandinavian Peninsula. I wouldn't include the Insular North Germanic-speaking countries in Scandinavia - though it would be practical to have an easy way to refer to all North Germanic-speaking countries... Nordic Countries also includes Finland, of course.
To confuse it even more, an entirely 3rd definition is that many in politics speak of the "NB8 countries" (Nordic-Baltic 8), which is Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
The latter have a governmental connection to Denmark and are thus closer connected to Denmark than Finland is.
I'm aware of that: but it doesn't make them Scandinavian any more than a Frenchman from Tahiti or Guyana is western European.

And it means that there is, as far as the UCI is concerned and therefore cycling records, no such thing as a Faroese of Greenlandic cyclist.