Tour of Denmark 2025 (12/8 - 16/8)

Page 11 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 5, 2023
3,028
4,242
12,180
The vegetation is moving, there is wind - but so far they have constantly been riding in fairly covered terrain, lot's of trees and hedges.

If they hit an open patch this could get interesting.
 
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
I just noticed that they are riding two different hills today, both called the exact same thing (Golfbakken = The Golf Hill") in different parts of the country :D

True! Both are leading up to a golf course. With the "Vejle" climb being the tougher of the two.

golfbakken-svanninge.png

Golfbakken, first climb on the route.

ibaekvej-ibaek.png

Golfbakken, second climb on the route.
 
Jul 4, 2009
2,790
2,519
17,180
True! Both are leading up to a golf course. With the "Vejle" climb being the tougher of the two.

golfbakken-svanninge.png

Golfbakken, first climb on the route.

ibaekvej-ibaek.png

Golfbakken, second climb on the route.
An oddity with both those climbs in one stage. Having said that, this type of names is not my cup of tea at all. Too provincial. Why not just say "Bjergevej" and "Ibækvej". Besides, nicknames for climbs instead of geographical references are bad when things change. Like the so-called "Blue Horse" climb near Vejle. The firm "Blue Horse" has moved.
 
Mar 5, 2023
3,028
4,242
12,180
The old bridge they are on now is dedicated to trains, bicycles and pedestrians BTW - no cars are allowed on it on normal days - they go across the newer bridge - so all the tarmac you see on the bridge is everyday bike lanes.

The old bridge is from 1935, the newer one from 1970.

(115K to go for those watching the stage later)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 12, 2015
7,060
1,204
20,680
They are about to hit the old bridge to Jutland, for those that want to watch it :)

After the bridge they turn north, which means the western wind comes into play.
That bridge would do well in a time trial if possible. Highlighting the aerodynamics of the riders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danskebjerge
Mar 5, 2023
3,028
4,242
12,180
That bridge would do well in a time trial if possible. Highlighting the aerodynamics of the riders.
It's only 1.1K long, so the effects would be quite small - unless I misunderstand you and you mean in terms of watchability?
 
Mar 5, 2023
3,028
4,242
12,180
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
We're part of Scandinavia because we used to own it - the reason is historical not geographic ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jul 4, 2009
2,790
2,519
17,180
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
The latter have a governmental connection to Denmark and are thus closer connected to Denmark than Finland is. The southern part of the Scandinavian peninsula was Danish until the 17th century. Currently there is no direct geographical connection that explains the status of Denmark as Scandinavian.
 
Jul 16, 2024
1,873
2,105
5,680
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
Scandinavia is not the same as the Scandinavian Peninsula. I wouldn't include the Insular North Germanic-speaking countries in Scandinavia - though it would be practical to have an easy way to refer to all North Germanic-speaking countries... Nordic Countries also includes Finland, of course.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,177
29,819
28,180
If Finland is not part of Scandinavia (and I understand the geographical definition whereby it is not, but don't really understand how Denmark claims to be on that peninsula), then Greenland and the Faroes certainly aren't.
Inhabitants of Als and North Jutlandic Island also consider themselves Jutes, despite not being part of the peninsula. Some things are not understood if only understood narrowly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: E_F_
Mar 5, 2023
3,028
4,242
12,180
Scandinavia is not the same as the Scandinavian Peninsula. I wouldn't include the Insular North Germanic-speaking countries in Scandinavia - though it would be practical to have an easy way to refer to all North Germanic-speaking countries... Nordic Countries also includes Finland, of course.
To confuse it even more, an entirely 3rd definition is that many in politics speak of the "NB8 countries" (Nordic-Baltic 8), which is Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jul 16, 2024
1,873
2,105
5,680
To confuse it even more, an entirely 3rd definition is that many in politics speak of the "NB8 countries" (Nordic-Baltic 8), which is Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania :p
Yeah, and linguistically Estonia isn't Baltic, but rather Finnic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
The latter have a governmental connection to Denmark and are thus closer connected to Denmark than Finland is.
I'm aware of that: but it doesn't make them Scandinavian any more than a Frenchman from Tahiti or Guyana is western European.

And it means that there is, as far as the UCI is concerned and therefore cycling records, no such thing as a Faroese of Greenlandic cyclist.