So almost 800W for more than a minute, not too shabby
View: https://twitter.com/Domestique___/status/1756985884585423002
View: https://twitter.com/Domestique___/status/1756985884585423002
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
So almost 800W for more than a minute, not too shabby
View: https://twitter.com/Domestique___/status/1756985884585423002
yeah, in post race interview, Lamperti said that the plan was to sprint with himselfNot great camera work but it looked as though Magnier was trying to lead out Lamperti but was just too strong for the entire field.
You would think Specialized would prioritise the American prospect, whilst plenty of French teams should be fishing for Magnier's services.Magnier and Lamperti are quite the duo, Quick-Step definitely did a good job in this transfer season but can't see the team holding them both in the long run.
I didn't understand their tactics. At a moment they were pacing the group when it was going uphill, but it was clear Lamperti wasn't feeling well because he almost dropped already. So I don't get why they kept pacing. Eventually Lamperti lost the GC.Where was Quick-Step? Big group at the end.
There's a few more than that I think. But ya a top 10 would be great for him.he should be able to do better than that, I think. There are something like 5 good climbers in the race only.
he should be able to do better than that, I think. There are something like 5 good climbers in the race only.
Based on Kulsets consistent results around 15-20 it got me thinking.
You are guaranteed to finish 15th in every single race you enter for your whole career other than GC which will be whatever it ends up with based on your 15th spots. Or you are guaranteed to win one race per year and nothing else and otherwise you finish at the back of the field like above 100th place.
What would you choose?
I had hoped to get some GC points from Gil Gelders tomorrow but he lost almost 3 minutes today so that chance is basically gone.Personally intrigued about Faure-Prost tomorrow.
Unless that one win is a massive one most of the years, 15th in every race is much better for optimizing your earnings as a pro. That can even bag you some GC wins in the right circumstances. Could actually be a fun exercise to try and find a race where 15th in every stage would win you the race. One where a big breakaway went on one or several stage(s) might be a candidate.Based on Kulsets consistent results around 15-20 it got me thinking.
You are guaranteed to finish 15th in every single race you enter for your whole career other than GC which will be whatever it ends up with based on your 15th spots. Or you are guaranteed to win one race per year and nothing else and otherwise you finish at the back of the field like above 100th place.
What would you choose?
Riding for myself to get a result or helping my teammates? Goes for both cases.Based on Kulsets consistent results around 15-20 it got me thinking.
You are guaranteed to finish 15th in every single race you enter for your whole career other than GC which will be whatever it ends up with based on your 15th spots. Or you are guaranteed to win one race per year and nothing else and otherwise you finish at the back of the field like above 100th place.
What would you choose?
I was thinking 2001 would be a good year but there were only 14 riders in the break that got 35 minutes and 15th was with the peloton.Riding for myself to get a result or helping my teammates? Goes for both cases.
Of course, breakaways means that you can get a very good GC position by always being 15th. In the Tour last year, it'd give you a GC result around 6th thanks to stage 19.
EDIT: I suspected the 2017 Tour would give a good result, and with a quick estimate I think you'd be 2nd in the end.
With 2001 how it was then 15th on all stages would have been 6th in GC. However if we allow 15th to have the same finishing time as no 14 on stage 8 rather than be first in the peloton then we would end up winning that Tour by 12:49,I was thinking 2001 would be a good year but there were only 14 riders in the break that got 35 minutes and 15th was with the peloton.
I think i read Magnier had a lot of interest from French teams before signing with SQS, but he sent them packing because the year before, when his results were not as great, they didn't want him.You would think Specialized would prioritise the American prospect, whilst plenty of French teams should be fishing for Magnier's services.