King Of The Wolds said:
movingtarget said:
YavorD said:
Well, talking about "offensive cycling", Tour hasn't been exactly offensive since...2006 (when I start watching) and this is long before Sky and it will remain after Sky. About Giro/Vuelta, considering the profiles and everything, I don't think a team is able to control the race as much as in the Tour. That said I don't want Soler to Sky. They already have Bernal/Sivakov and even Hart was looking really good earlier this year. Plus is a bit ridiculous to see 10 man group, lead by 5 Sky riders, unless of course they use their power to destroy the peloton (2013-PSM 2015).
2007 to 2011 were not defensive Tours. 2014 had Nibali just riding away from the rest of the field at every chance and there was definitely offense on the cobbles stage.
Sky aren't defensive either. They ride on the front at an infernal pace, split the peloton to bits, and those that can, hang on for dear life. When Quick Step do that in the cross winds or on the cobbles, everyone goes giddy with delight.
Do they, though? In the Tour they have really only done that three times in nine years: Ax-3-Domaines in 2013, Mont Ventoux in 2013, and Pierre Saint Martin in 2015. Add a few other times (the Vuelta in 2014, the Finestre stage this year, a few times in the Dauphine), but most of the time in recent years the train has been used defensively. Look at the stage this year when Kruiswijk attacked (the Alpe d'Huez stage IIRC) and they rode slowly to get the whole lot over the mountain.
IMO it's not a bad thing. It's the best way to win a bike race: only attack when you need to. It's a bit like Peter Ebdon in snooker: not glamorous, not exciting, but he made life bloody hard for his opponents, backed them into tactical corners, and made them play to his strengths. But it is defensive. (And I
like Sky.)