The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Hairy Wheels said:You know, I used to think cycling forums were full of retreads...but man, after reading a few pages of that forum I'm in shock. These guys are serious losers. Just dorks...it was hard to read.
Digger said:"I believe tyler is not guilty of cheating.
We all have our reasons for what we believe. I believe him."
Mattyreed.........
this_is_edie said:yeah... that reflects what I've read in many posts sort of 'I believe him because he's a nice guy and of course nice guy don't cheat'. I think this is one reason that many Americans still believe that Flandis and Hamilton are innocent and were somehow shafted, because they come across as nice guys in the press and are nice to talk to in person.
It is much easier to believe that some Spanish/Italian/insert any other non-English speaking European rider is guilty because their personality does not come across in translated articles and there's not chance to ride with them and have a sense of knowing them.
BikeCentric said:
Gee333 said:What's the big deal? The guy apparently has known Tyler for years so now he's taking him on as a coach for the cycling aspect of his sport. It's not like Tyler doesn't know about cycling. Sure he doped and the guy is biased since they are friends but why harp on the tri guys?
Hell, if I knew Pantani and he wanted to help me with my climbing on the bike I'd jump all over it despite his alleged "past". Of course that'll never happen cuz I don't know Pantani and it's hard to get to know someone that's 6 feet under ground. But you get my point.
pedaling squares said:Of course I understand the shock, given Hamilton's use of PED's. But I don't go so far as to assume that an athlete should not rely upon Hamilton's advice to prepare himself for competition. There is so much that a man with his experience can offer, why not listen to him? I would if I was a pro and I thought that he was the best person to help me improve. I know that many will think that taking advice on training from someone who took PED's is just like visiting the clinic of a doctor who has done blood transfusions for cyclists. To me, this is different. There is much more to being an elite cyclist than the advantages to performance/recovery that PED's give.
pedaling squares said:Of course I understand the shock, given Hamilton's use of PED's. But I don't go so far as to assume that an athlete should not rely upon Hamilton's advice to prepare himself for competition. There is so much that a man with his experience can offer, why not listen to him? I would if I was a pro and I thought that he was the best person to help me improve. I know that many will think that taking advice on training from someone who took PED's is just like visiting the clinic of a doctor who has done blood transfusions for cyclists. To me, this is different. There is much more to being an elite cyclist than the advantages to performance/recovery that PED's give.
Hairy Wheels said:You know, I used to think cycling forums were full of retreads...but man, after reading a few pages of that forum I'm in shock. These guys are serious losers. Just dorks...it was hard to read.
Oldman said:I am speachless. Read this excerpt for yourself:
DrDubs
Apr 7, 10 20:42
Post #8 of 196 (6905 views)
Copy Shortcut
Re: Matt Reed has lost his mind. [krider] [In reply to] Can't Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good for Matt!
Tyler is a super cool guy and knows his ****. Matt is smart to take him on as a coach.
Digger said:My human side doesn't have a huge issue with Tyler making a living - heaven knows the guy must not have a pot to p*** in. My issue is what i posted on the first page here from Matt Reed - him saying he believed Tyler is innocent. Lost for words.
BikeCentric said:Yeah I read that whole thread on Slowtwitch and my only conclusion is that the triathlon community is a bunch of idiots who deserve everything they are going to get out of this. If they are really so blind and stupid that they can't see the dangers of letting ex-dopers into the support structure of their sport then they are going to end up just like cycling. The reason it is so hard to change cycling is because cycling is institutionalized with people who've been around doping forever, from DS's to soigneurs, to sponsors, to riders.
If the tri community can't see what's coming to them if they head down this road then F them I say. Fortunately for them their sport is so **** boring to watch that it will never attract the amount of sponsorship cash that cycling has and therefore will probably not develop as serious of a doping problem on a relative basis.
BikeCentric said:
matty reed said:Matty Reed used the wrong word in a twitter.