SuperHuman
BANNED
- May 16, 2011
- 30
- 0
- 0
hrotha said:Again, Armstrong was still riding this season and he was enjoying the position in the peloton he gained through PEDs. His going down is a powerful, potentially cathartic symbol, especially as many riders seem to admire him. Now, they'll know that even if you're the biggest rider, and even if you're protected by the powers that be, you're not safe.
Riders must be 100% certain that they'll get caught. Then we can work on making it so that getting caught after the fact isn't still worth it.
If you minimize the boosts you can get from doping through programs like a properly handled biological passport, AND you keep up the police pressure on PED trafficking and use, there'll be a point where doping isn't worth it for most but the most reckless riders.
I think you need to make a distinction between the American scene and the rest of the world. Superstars like Valverde, Basso, and perhaps Contador this year, get banned for doping but come back and are still treated like big stars. Basso was cheered for winning the Giro last year. To learn that Armstrong doped along with the rest of the top tear of his era isn't going to be cathartic in Europe where most of the sport is based. It will have a negative effect but it won't be cathartic - it will just put a slight downer on the sport as a whole and it will move on as normal. Pro cycling has always been about what's happening now, not what happened in the past - it's a very forward looking sport.
