The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Original article at (in Spanish) - https://as.com/ciclismo/vuelta_espana/matxin-fin-de-contrato-con-el-uae-renovacion-sin-firmar-n/The Spanish scout was brought into the team several years ago after proving his worth at Soudal - Quick-Step and quickly became a big and important influence in the team, having a key role in the signing of riders such as Tadej Pogacar and Juan Ayuso with whom he is very close with. Besides a scout, he is also a sports manager in the Emirati team, and often the team's voice during races where he is always open to talk to fans and journalists alike. Spanish newspaper AS reports now that Matxin's contract is ending at the end of this year but it has not been renewed. It is unclear whether it still will be or if 2024 will really be the final chapter of Matxin in UAE.
Matxin has outside offers on the table... although the intention of both parties is to renew. Therefore, there are matters to be dealt with, something that will be done in the next few days, taking advantage of the presence of the Italian Mauro Gianetti (the CEO) at La Vuelta these days.
Press conference from Vanthourenhout in 40min. But it wouldn't make sense to already disclose his new employer. If it's UAE, and he still has to coach the WC... That would be a conflict of interest.Good!
Matxin - Sports Manager
Vanthourenhout - Head Sports Director
for next year?
Why? It's like Wellens riding for Belguim while being employed by UAE.Press conference from Vanthourenhout in 40min. But it wouldn't make sense to already disclose his new employer. If it's UAE, and he still has to coach the WC... That would be a conflict of interest.
Because there is only 1 director, and Wellens can be replaced by 7 other riders. There is a reason why this person can't be employed by a team, at least in Belgium.Why? It's like Wellens riding for Belguim while being employed by UAE.
Soler is more likely to help Pog vs Ayuso.
Every party has one of those!Ayuso having a grand old time with the lads!
I don't get what tension one might expect from such a combination. You (profess to) have ideals and you do business. What is there to square? What is the coherent alternative? I think such problematisations are usually raised from a confused stance with uninterrogated premises that would lead to very extreme conclusions if fully fleshed out. Must we abandon all ideals in order to engage with the real world, messy as it is? Must all trade and collaboration between "good" and "bad" states end to ensure the purity of the "good"?Surprised that this NY Times article, although mainly focused on the NBA, doesn’t include a mention of the UAE team we know so well.
Opinion | The N.B.A. Is Partnering With a Repressive Regime
How can the N.B.A. square its profession of high ideals with doing business with a repressive government?www.nytimes.com
Really? You cant come up with anything. Ok.I don't get what tension one might expect from such a combination. You (profess to) have ideals and you do business. What is there to square? What is the coherent alternative? I think such problematisations are usually raised from a confused stance with uninterrogated premises that would lead to very extreme conclusions if fully fleshed out. Must we abandon all ideals in order to engage with the real world, messy as it is? Must all trade and collaboration between "good" and "bad" states end to ensure the purity of the "good"?
Or more relevant for this thread: what is so wrong with "sportswashing"? What are the petrodollars better spent on?
It's not my money. I don't think giving it all to charity is on the table (although sponsoring cycling almost qualifies for that).Really? You cant come up with anything. Ok.
Im not trying to get political.... just that your post was off-putting, ignorant and distasteful.It's not my money. I don't think giving it all to charity is on the table (although sponsoring cycling almost qualifies for that).
Which of their alternative investments are better to you?
It’s a hopeless cause because there seems to be an insatiable appetite for bullsh*t these days. I just don’t want to hear FIFA or the NBA or UCI give us the “growing the sport” bull when it’s purely about making money.I don't get what tension one might expect from such a combination. You (profess to) have ideals and you do business. What is there to square? What is the coherent alternative? I think such problematisations are usually raised from a confused stance with uninterrogated premises that would lead to very extreme conclusions if fully fleshed out. Must we abandon all ideals in order to engage with the real world, messy as it is? Must all trade and collaboration between "good" and "bad" states end to ensure the purity of the "good"?
Or more relevant for this thread: what is so wrong with "sportswashing"? What are the petrodollars better spent on?
Unfortunately, naked honesty would likely be received worse.It’s a hopeless cause because there seems to be an insatiable appetite for bullsh*t these days. I just don’t want to hear FIFA or the NBA or UCI give us the “growing the sport” bull when it’s purely about making money.
So True—like I said, it’s a hopeless cause.Unfortunately, naked honesty would likely be received worse.
They can't so don't be worryNot sure if this is the right place to say this, but I really hope UAE is not going to be allowed to give the rainbow jersey the same treatment they give to NC jerseys.
I've never seen a team f*ck up a WC jersey before so I guess UCI actually applies the rules at least in this case?
If Pogacar repeats this year he'll be wearing thе rainbow jersey like 10 daysNot sure if this is the right place to say this, but I really hope UAE is not going to be allowed to give the rainbow jersey the same treatment they give to NC jerseys.
I've never seen a team f*ck up a WC jersey before so I guess UCI actually applies the rules at least in this case?