• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

UCI corruption

Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Yesterday Pat McQuaid made the comical claim that There has never been corruption in the UCI


The UCI, and McQuaid himself, has a long history of Corruption

During apartheid McQuaid raced in South Africa under an fake name. He was banned for life by the IOC. How is a person banned for life now an elected member of the IOC?

After winning the 1997 Laurant Brochard tested Lidocaine. Verburggen actively covered up the positive, first delaying the announcement then accepted a back dated TUE to let him off......dispite back dated TUE's being clearly against the rules

Lance Armstrong tested positive for Cortisone at the 1999 Tour. Armstrong and his team were given advanced notice of the positive and allowed to develop an excuse. Despite multiple prior public claims that he did not have a TUE he produced a back dated TUE, which the UCI accepted despite it being against the UCI's rules

Julian DeVries, Floyd Landis, and others have said that Armstrong told them that he paid the UCI $500,000 to make an EPO positive from the 2001 Tour de Suisse disappear. Sylivia Schenk, UCI board member and head of it's ethics committee said

“Since 1998 the UCI has done a lot to combat doping but everything is different where Armstrong is concerned,” “There is obviously a strong relationship with Armstrong,” Schenk added. “The UCI took a lot of money from Armstrong – to my knowledge 500,000 dollars – and now there is speculation that there are financial connections to Armstrong, as well as the American market. I do not know what sort of connections Verbruggen has.”

From 2002-2006 Hein Vebruggen made multiple proclamations that the Peloton was clean. He even sued WADA for telling the truth about the sports problems. At the same time Hein was telling people that the sport was clean they were

Warning Tyler Hamilton that his HR-OFF score was 123.8 on April 24, the day before L-B-L, where he finished ninth. Five days later on April 29,it was a very high 132.9,(The Limit is 133) with a corresponding reticulocyte count of 0.22 percent and a haematocrit level of 49.7 percent (the limit being 50)

They were warning Levi that his Off score was 132.8 when the limit is 133 and normal is 90.

We know that dozens of other riders where following similar programs with Fuentes and had similar questionable blood values.....but the UCI publicly claimed the sport was clean. This was a lie.

Jesus Manzano gave detailed information about doping in the sport. He talked about how Fuentes blood doped riders and how Walter Viru, who ran a UCI blood lab, would give advanced notice of Out of Competition Control (OCC)to his team and to USPS. The UCI did nothing. They ignored his claims for years. Fuentes has been arrested twice and Viru was arrest last year....the UCI pretended Manzano was nuts, bitter, etc.

Verburggen retired from the UCI in order to set up a company that would own and sell the rights for all ProTour races. Publicly the UCI liked to pretend that the conflict with the ASO, RCS, and Unipublic was about the number of teams guaranteed a start spot but the real conflict was TV rights. Verburggen's power grab was not an attempt to help the sport but an attempt to enrich himself. For the next 4 years the sport was in chaos....all because of Verbuggen's greed.

A group headed by Hein Verbuggen and Lance Armstrong tried to buy the Tour in 2006. It is hard to ignore the conflict of interest when the head of the UCI and the sports largest rider are business partners. They were unable to secure funding for the purchase and set out to devalue the ASO.

The UCI rules in 2007 were clear. If a rider missed a single Out of Competition Control (OCC) in the 6 weeks prior to a Grand Tour the rider is not allowed to start the GT. In addition if a rider missed 3 OCC's it counts as a positive. Rasmussen missed 4 OCC's in the weeks prior to the Tour. The UCI did nothing

They timed their announcement of the missed tests for the eve of the Tour, so it would cause maximum embarrassment and damage to the ASO.
Prudhomme said at the time

“Verbruggen wanted to buy the Tour, but we said ‘No thanks,’ so now he wants to get the price down,”

The UCI set up the BioPassport as an independent oversight that could insure that riders with questionable blood values, like Levi and Tyler could be sanctioned without a positive. It was far from independent. In fact 5 riders whose passports were ruled questionable by the committee were not pursued by the UCI. Was this because these riders had the financial resources to fight the sanction and were thus untouchable?

Feel free to add more, this is just a start
 
More to the point why does no one ever pick up and challenge McQuaid on these points.

We could also add how McQuaid and the UCI handled Contador's positive test and their apparent attempts to suppress the news and to give him advanced notice to prepare an excuse.
 
Jul 6, 2010
2,340
0
0
Visit site
The history of the UCI notifying National Federations of riders' positives, not enacting sanctions, and relying on the Federations to deal with the results (which they commonly ignored or used as leverage against riders).
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Visit site
• Deliberate obfuscations of fact in the media.

• Commenting publicly on doping cases that have not been adjudicated.

• Failure to provide any kind of transparency.

• Heavy-handed interference in the operations of the 3 grand tours.

• Seizing the doping controls at the '10 TDF.


I'd love to try starting a grass-roots opposition to McQuaid, but who am I really going to complain to, Bill Peterson? Steve Johnson?
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Visit site
Quality thread.

Nuttin much to add yet...
But for this:
I feel corruption is confirmed indirectly by McQuaid, in as far as doesn't call Landis' claims worrying.
Compare: I remember David Howman was once confronted on the record and on camera by German journalists with suspitions that their might be corruption among WADA officials. His direct answer was: "that's worrying..I don't know if that is true, but it sounds like something we have to look into" (my wording of how I remember it. The scene is from the Blut und Spielen documentary.) Now that is an answer you'd expect from someone who has nothing to hide.
 
On 11 June 2005, Iñigo Landaluze was tested during the Dauphiné.

Landaluze went on to win the Dauphiné on GC, a rare highlight in an otherwise fairly unremarkable palmarès (and yes, more doping stuff later on).

He subsequently returned a positive for elevated testosterone, but we didn't hear about it until 21 December 2005 and seemingly only then because the result appears to have been outed by the Colombian press, which was still miffed at their man Botero coming in second.

So Landaluze was eventually busted by the UCI, then acquitted by CAS in December 2006 due to procedural irregularities at the lab.

Given that I have been unable to find any evidence of this story before 21 December 2005 give or take a day, did it really take six months to turn around the test result, or was the UCI stalling for time because it knew about the procedural issues, or was somebody trying to bury the story?
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Visit site
nevada said:
Mrs John Murphy said:
More to the point why does no one ever pick up and challenge McQuaid on these points.

Because they would never get a press pass again !

Unfortunately, the internet killed journalism. 15 years ago, few top publications would have hesitated to risk the relationship when tough questions needed to be answered. Now McQuaid can mouth-off with a widely fractured media and not worry about alienating the larger new gathering orgs.

Hopefully pad-based (subscription) journalism will bring some "punch" back to the press again.
 
Jun 12, 2010
1,234
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
Yesterday Pat McQuaid made the comical claim that There has never been corruption in the UCI


The UCI, and McQuaid himself, has a long history of Corruption

During apartheid McQuaid raced in South Africa under an fake name. He was banned for life by the IOC. How is a person banned for life now an elected member of the IOC?

After winning the 1997 Laurant Brochard tested Lidocaine. Verburggen actively covered up the positive, first delaying the announcement then accepted a back dated TUE to let him off......dispite back dated TUE's being clearly against the rules

Lance Armstrong tested positive for Cortisone at the 1999 Tour. Armstrong and his team were given advanced notice of the positive and allowed to develop an excuse. Despite multiple prior public claims that he did not have a TUE he produced a back dated TUE, which the UCI accepted despite it being against the UCI's rules

Julian DeVries, Floyd Landis, and others have said that Armstrong told them that he paid the UCI $500,000 to make an EPO positive from the 2001 Tour de Suisse disappear. Sylivia Schenk, UCI board member and head of it's ethics committee said



From 2002-2006 Hein Vebruggen made multiple proclamations that the Peloton was clean. He even sued WADA for telling the truth about the sports problems. At the same time Hein was telling people that the sport was clean they were

Warning Tyler Hamilton that his HR-OFF score was 123.8 on April 24, the day before L-B-L, where he finished ninth. Five days later on April 29,it was a very high 132.9,(The Limit is 133) with a corresponding reticulocyte count of 0.22 percent and a haematocrit level of 49.7 percent (the limit being 50)

They were warning Levi that his Off score was 132.8 when the limit is 133 and normal is 90.

We know that dozens of other riders where following similar programs with Fuentes and had similar questionable blood values.....but the UCI publicly claimed the sport was clean. This was a lie.

Jesus Manzano gave detailed information about doping in the sport. He talked about how Fuentes blood doped riders and how Walter Viru, who ran a UCI blood lab, would give advanced notice of Out of Competition Control (OCC)to his team and to USPS. The UCI did nothing. They ignored his claims for years. Fuentes has been arrested twice and Viru was arrest last year....the UCI pretended Manzano was nuts, bitter, etc.

Verburggen retired from the UCI in order to set up a company that would own and sell the rights for all ProTour races. Publicly the UCI liked to pretend that the conflict with the ASO, RCS, and Unipublic was about the number of teams guaranteed a start spot but the real conflict was TV rights. Verburggen's power grab was not an attempt to help the sport but an attempt to enrich himself. For the next 4 years the sport was in chaos....all because of Verbuggen's greed.

A group headed by Hein Verbuggen and Lance Armstrong tried to buy the Tour in 2006. It is hard to ignore the conflict of interest when the head of the UCI and the sports largest rider are business partners. They were unable to secure funding for the purchase and set out to devalue the ASO.

The UCI rules in 2007 were clear. If a rider missed a single Out of Competition Control (OCC) in the 6 weeks prior to a Grand Tour the rider is not allowed to start the GT. In addition if a rider missed 3 OCC's it counts as a positive. Rasmussen missed 4 OCC's in the weeks prior to the Tour. The UCI did nothing

They timed their announcement of the missed tests for the eve of the Tour, so it would cause maximum embarrassment and damage to the ASO.
Prudhomme said at the time

“Verbruggen wanted to buy the Tour, but we said ‘No thanks,’ so now he wants to get the price down,”

The UCI set up the BioPassport as an independent oversight that could insure that riders with questionable blood values, like Levi and Tyler could be sanctioned without a positive. It was far from independent. In fact 5 riders whose passports were ruled questionable by the committee were not pursued by the UCI. Was this because these riders had the financial resources to fight the sanction and were thus untouchable?

Feel free to add more, this is just a start

Good post RR.
Perhaps somone may correct me if I`v got this wrong but I seam to recall an obstacle to the buying of the TDF is some kind of French law with regards to cultural "monuments" not being owned by non French Nationals and the TDF comes into that catogory.
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
Verburggen retired from the UCI in order to set up a company that would own and sell the rights for all ProTour races. Publicly the UCI liked to pretend that the conflict with the ASO, RCS, and Unipublic was about the number of teams guaranteed a start spot but the real conflict was TV rights. Verburggen's power grab was not an attempt to help the sport but an attempt to enrich himself. For the next 4 years the sport was in chaos....all because of Verbuggen's greed.

A group headed by Hein Verbuggen and Lance Armstrong tried to buy the Tour in 2006. It is hard to ignore the conflict of interest when the head of the UCI and the sports largest rider are business partners. They were unable to secure funding for the purchase and set out to devalue the ASO.

These are two blockbusters right here. But don't expect the media to write about it. This is SO FAR ahead of what they're even capable of thinking right now. You are years ahead of your time on these.

Great post RR. I guess all that we can really do is become historians and archivists, and also become mini PR firms to help the cause.
 
With cycling's reputation in tatters, Pound renewed his attack on the UCI, personally blaming Verbruggen, who is head of the IOC's ethics commission for next year's Beijing Olympics, for creating a climate in which doping could flourish.

He said: "I can remember long before I was involved in anti-doping, discussing cycling's problems with Hein Verbruggen, when he was president of the UCI before the Festina affair. I was saying, 'Hein, you have got a real problem in your sport and you don't seem able to deal with it'.

"He said, 'If people don't mind the Tour de France at 25 kilometres per hour, the riders don't have to prepare. But if they want it at 42kph then, I'm sorry, the riders can't do it without preparation', as he called it."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot.../Verbruggen-returns-****-Pound-criticism.html
 
Jun 12, 2010
1,234
0
0
Visit site
BotanyBay said:
These are two blockbusters right here. But don't expect the media to write about it. This is SO FAR ahead of what they're even capable of thinking right now. You are years ahead of your time on these.

Great post RR. I guess all that we can really do is become historians and archivists, and also become mini PR firms to help the cause.

Wasnt there talk that the French Premier interviened directly and effectivly told the parties involved to sort it out and stop damaging the tour?
I`ve absalutely no idea of figures but the tours positive efect on tourism must be of considerable national importance way beyond the massive inconvenience it can cause.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Darryl Webster said:
Good post RR.
Perhaps somone may correct me if I`v got this wrong but I seam to recall an obstacle to the buying of the TDF is some kind of French law with regards to cultural "monuments" not being owned by non French Nationals and the TDF comes into that catogory.

No, that was not the case. Armstrong was unable to raise the funds to meet the ASO's price.
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
0
0
Visit site
Both Gruppo Cinelli and King Eddy attack the UCI in this article:

http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/results/2000/sep00/sep30news.shtml


gruppo cinelli said:
the UCI has never wanted to listen to us. The decision to ban Spinaci bars was taken too quickly without any real reason.


King Eddy said:
Asked about the recent rule changes by the UCI concerning the Hour Record, Merckx was not afraid to attack the governing body of world cycling just as he attacked his rivals when he was racing.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
Yesterday Pat McQuaid made the comical claim that There has never been corruption in the UCI


The UCI, and McQuaid himself, has a long history of Corruption
34hfmg6.jpg


A message from his excellencey (and not corrupt) President Pat McQuaid.

***CEASE AND DESIST***

Dear "Bloggers and so forth and journalists who write under pseudonyms on blogs".

Cease and desist.

There is no corruption in the UCI (in 2006?)

It is not a conflict of interest to have my son as a riders agent.
It is not a conflict of interest to have my brother bid for a World Championships.
It is not a confict of interest to have a rider give 'donations'.
There is no blacklist of 'bitter' or boring riders.
There is no good guinness in Switzerland.

Also "Sometimes I’ve made mistakes, given wrong facts out unwittingly and it’s come back at me....." but even still Schneck just pulled figures out of the air, and the receipt is there for anyone to see (subject to terms and conditions) and anyone is welcome to stay for a day at the UCI (subject to terms & conditions).
 
Jun 12, 2010
1,234
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
No, that was not the case. Armstrong was unable to raise the funds to meet the ASO's price.

Maybe how I heard it was that was the "reason" created after the French Premier interviened and said the bickering had to stop?
Sorry to be vaugue...read so many articles it`s hard to recall were I got the idea from.:)
Theres so many vested and conflicting interests involved in the TDF it realy is that old saying:
"What a web we weave when we practice to deceive". :D
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Visit site
Darryl Webster said:
Maybe how I heard it was that was the "reason" created after the French Premier interviened and said the bickering had to stop?
Sorry to be vaugue...read so many articles it`s hard to recall were I got the idea from.:)
Theres so many vested and conflicting interests involved in the TDF it realy is that old saying:
"What a web we weave when we practice to deceive". :D


I think you're thinking of the UCI's attempted shakedown in regards to the ProTour and all ProTour teams getting a guaranteed invite to all Grand Tours... and the ASO's saying "bite me" in return. This is the devaluation attempt that RR is referring to. The UCI (at Hein's urging) took moves to create instability so that the price-tag would fall. Hein was playing puppet-master. Armstrong was aboard to wow the investors. Sorta like sending an escort to their hotel room to "put them in a good mood" ;)
 
Feb 21, 2010
1,007
0
0
Visit site
Geez, devalue the Tour in 2006...

Hmm... I wonder if an appetizer of Puerto with a main course of Skewered Landis Loin would serve as a proper menu to drive down value?
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
Visit site
Benotti69 said:
the failure of the UCI to investigate any of the claims made by its members (riders) into doping.

You can implicate all professional sports in this, particularly through the dark alley of the late 80's through the early 2000's. The problem is much larger than just the UCI and more complex than the rationalization that they are receiving payments to keep quiet.