Terrible, terrible weather conditions. It's quite technical as well. We might get a surprise winner/contender.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I think it's important to have a category for young riders to develop and compete at a high level that is generally watched by the pro teams to find new talent. Many riders, particularly those that get into cycling at an older age, don't show their full potential until they're 18. Without U23, many riders that would show potential later on might never be recognised by pro teams before they retire at a young age as they have no perspective to turn pro.Presumably the reason that there is a men's U23 but not a women's is that women are considered to be physically capable of competing with anyone at, or soon after, the age of 20.
Given results in some major races, especially over the last few months, how much justification is there in the existence of a men's U23 category?
I think it's important to have a category for young riders to develop and compete at a high level that is generally watched by the pro teams to find new talent. Many riders, particularly those that get into cycling at an older age, don't show their full potential until they're 18. Without U23, many riders that would show potential later on might never be recognised by pro teams before they retire at a young age as they have no perspective to turn pro.
I've also heard opinions that U23 is even too restrictive and the classic amateur category is to be preferred as it provides opportunities even for riders in their late twenties to show themselves at a high level. It's rare these days that riders older than 23 turn pro for the first time, although there are of course some notable exceptions.
I don't know the guy that well, but judging by the EC, Price-Pejtersen looks like a guy that will ride like a tank on the flat, but the gear he likes to push, makes me wonder how he'll fare on this course. Van Moer indeed very inconsistent.Prediction time once more?
**** *: Mikkel Bjerg
****: Brent Van Moer, Johan Price-Pejtersen
***: Tobias Foss, Stefan Bissegger, Marc Hirschi
**: Mathias Norsgaard, Ilan Van Wilder, Brandon McNulty, Ian Garrison
*: Kevin Geniets, Daan Hoole, Matteo Sobrero, Iver Knotten, João Almeida
Terrible, terrible weather conditions. It's quite technical as well. We might get a surprise winner/contender.
Beautiful British weather, is it too much to ask for the same on Sunday?
Fully agreed. However, this is of course based on who I think has the biggest chance to win, rather than who I think will finish 1st, 2nd and 3rd. I think Foss will finish higher than Price-Pejtersen for instance, but Foss has a problem that he never, ever wins, thus less stars. João Almeida is another case. Essentially, there are few who can call themselves better time trialists, but he is someone who hasn't fared all that well in these stand-alone time trials, like you often see with GC-riders.I don't know the guy that well, but judging by the EC, Price-Pejtersen looks like a guy that will ride like a tank on the flat, but the gear he likes to push, makes me wonder how he'll fare on this course. Van Moer indeed very inconsistent.
Healy was on a 1x setup. Looked to me like he was out of gears on the steeper ramps on the second part of the course.Hulgaard appear to have killed the 2nd part of the course, he was 14 seconds behind Healy at the intermediate, and is a minute ahead on the line.
I give him a 9 for artistic merit.That was some slide from Valter!