Berzin said:I don't think Ullrich was naturally the uber-talented rider for grand tours many people think he was. He gets way too much credit for what PED's did to alter his talents, making a rider he's never be without them. Just like Armstrong.
I believe, like many riders of his generation, Ullrich was a rider who exhibited a skillset that was more a byproduct of drugs than natural talent. Without EPO, blood transfusions and/or whatever else he doing, he would not have been a top-notch climber, and Arcalis never happens.
I do believe at worst Jan would have been a great classics, one-day and maybe week-long stage rider, just like Armstrong. But that's it.
As for Jan "attacking" Armstrong, that is just sensationalist media hype. If you read the interview, all he did was state a sobering account of Armstrong's deleterious effect on cycling. His opinions on the Armstrong situation to me seems succinct, to-the-point, and true. No attack there that I can see.
No personal attack but Mr. Ullrich has a little problem with the damage HE HIMSELF has done to cycling. His failure to acknowledge his own sins put him worse than Armstrong. Self denial is his refuge I guess, just like when he was competing. Still the same Jan. The fact that he blames the Armstrong revelations for cycling in Germany is ridiculous when viewed from the country's own little contributions to damage in cycling.