LarryBudMelman
BANNED
- Aug 31, 2011
- 329
- 0
- 0
Scott SoCal said:You realize the post was designed to illicit this exact response, right?
Don't feed the Chrissy.![]()
Yeah, thanks....
Scott SoCal said:You realize the post was designed to illicit this exact response, right?
Don't feed the Chrissy.![]()
Lance now raises taxes as well as killing babies! What a bleeding heart liberal!thehog said:Maybe not news but I find the Calfornia connection interesting.
__
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19970688
Teresa Casazza, president of the California Taxpayers Association, said the $855 million tax hike will create a new bureaucracy with little accountability to taxpayers. She noted that California already is struggling with unemployment and a budget deficit exceeding $10 billion.
"Now is not the time for Lance Armstrong to come into our state and ask us to support a flawed measure like Prop. 29, which would raise our taxes by nearly $1 billion to create another big-government spending program run by a commission of political appointees," Casazza said in a statement.
Scott SoCal said:You realize the post was designed to illicit this exact response, right?
Don't feed the Chrissy.![]()
MarkvW said:The Extreme Hater Referendum is at 134 signatures.
Where are all the people who believe that Birotte's decision "undermines a foundation" of our legal system? That there was an appearance of "tacit collusion"? That there was overwhelming evidence against Lance?
Glenn_Wilson said:I had to dig into this thread all day to find the post where it is linked. Post #1403 by RR, it had been buried with all the back and forth.
alleged crimes of Lance Armstrong despite overwhelming credible evidence given under oath.
giving an appearance of tacit collusion between Andre Birotte & Lance Armstrong
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petition...under/dBnnkGDr
From the amount of signatures to the petition not that many people care to get an explanation with regards to the lack of prosecution of LA.
Ulle Relaxes said:Lance now raises taxes as well as killing babies! What a bleeding heart liberal!
Glenn_Wilson said:Well it is true that someone can believe that Tyler his Twin and Floyd would get crushed on defense cross AND also believe that LA was on the gear.
Additionally some could hold a different opinion in regards to Betsy A. and draw their own conclusions on those opinions. It is ok to state them in here correct?
I do not agree with you on this Scott. (Not that it matters)
MarkvW said:Floyd would get reamed on cross. He's lied and defrauded people in an effort to cover up his doping and he only came clean after all hope of riding pro had been dashed. He may have even solicited help from Lance. Then there's the Grey Manrod statements and his big pending qui tam case against Lance. Anybody who thinks that jurors would have been impressed with Floyd's honesty after hearing all that is nuts.
When Floyd testifies to the doping of Lance and the Posties, it looks like Floyd would have been one in a small crowd of witnesses to testify to that fact. However, when it comes to statements that Lance told Floyd alone, Floyd's dishonesty and bias would surely have mattered.
thehog said:I have to agree. That petition website is going the same way as facts4lance! (which served its purpose mind you according to Fabani)
Glenn_Wilson said:I had to dig into this thread all day to find the post where it is linked. Post #1403 by RR, it had been buried with all the back and forth.
alleged crimes of Lance Armstrong despite overwhelming credible evidence given under oath.
giving an appearance of tacit collusion between Andre Birotte & Lance Armstrong
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petition...under/dBnnkGDr
From the amount of signatures to the petition not that many people care to get an explanation with regards to the lack of prosecution of LA.
MarkvW said:When Floyd testifies to the doping of Lance and the Posties, it looks like Floyd would have been one in a small crowd of witnesses to testify to that fact. However, when it comes to statements that Lance told Floyd alone, Floyd's dishonesty and bias would surely have mattered.
broken chain said:Say what you like but the fact remains that the Lance whipped everyone for 7 tours.
Everyone had access to the same chemicals as Lance did.
He was a 3d guy,discipline,desire,determination,(well 4d really if you consider drugs although the case against him was dropped)so he obviously didn't dope.
Tactical excellence along with a super aggresive style of riding pushed him over the top.Lance turned winding routes into straightaways by cuttting corners really close,as witness when he was tumbled by a hand bag.
In essence,he rode shorter distances than everyone else,maybe not by much but at that level it did make a big difference,literally seconds.
Lance was so obsessed,his meals were weighed to exact portions.
I guess having an ex-president as your friend also has its advantages.
He beat the best riders and the best dopers 7 times.
It was an equal playing field.
broken chain said:(well 4d really if you consider drugs although the case against him was dropped)so he obviously didn't dope.
broken chain said:He beat the best riders and the best dopers 7 times. It was an equal playing field.
broken chain said:Say what you like but the fact remains that the Lance whipped everyone for 7 tours.
Everyone had access to the same chemicals as Lance did.
He was a 3d guy,discipline,desire,determination,(well 4d really if you consider drugs although the case against him was dropped)so he obviously didn't dope.
Tactical excellence along with a super aggresive style of riding pushed him over the top.Lance turned winding routes into straightaways by cuttting corners really close,as witness when he was tumbled by a hand bag.
In essence,he rode shorter distances than everyone else,maybe not by much but at that level it did make a big difference,literally seconds.
Lance was so obsessed,his meals were weighed to exact portions.
I guess having an ex-president as your friend also has its advantages.
He beat the best riders and the best dopers 7 times.
It was an equal playing field.
DirtyWorks said:How many times do we have to go over this? The industry was telling him to lie, take the penalty and Wonderboy/UCI will find a team for him. Where do you think the bulk of the Floyd Fairness Fund came from?
So, Floyd uses the 'everyone does it. So what?" line like the Wonderboy army.
You seem fully committed to your opinion, like you know what you are talking about. Are you a trial attorney?
ChrisE said:You need to be a little more subtle next time.![]()
'Cept they're among the main reasons we know Armstrong was doping. So if you don't believe them, dismiss their claims outright because they're "liars" and "nutjobs", then what's the alternative?ChrisE said:You seem too smart to live in such a binary world Velocity.
If somebody thinks TH's and FL's past transgressions and lies will cause them to get massacred on cross examination, that does not mean that same somebody thinks LA didn't dope.
If somebody thinks BA is a nutjob, that does not necessarily mean they think LA didn't dope.
Got it?
VeloCity said:'Cept they're among the main reasons we know Armstrong was doping. So if you don't believe them, dismiss their claims outright because they're "liars" and "nutjobs", then what's the alternative?
VeloCity said:'Cept they're among the main reasons we know Armstrong was doping. So if you don't believe them, dismiss their claims outright because they're "liars" and "nutjobs", then what's the alternative?
MarkvW said:The Extreme Hater Referendum is at 134 signatures.
Where are all the people who believe that Birotte's decision "undermines a foundation" of our legal system? That there was an appearance of "tacit collusion"? That there was overwhelming evidence against Lance?
doolols said:I take it this is a joke? Just in case you missed the thousands of posts about this - the Department of Justice dropped the criminal, federal case against LA. It does not mean that he didn't dope. Lack of guilty verdict in one case doesn't automatically mean innocence in another. The doping case continues.
This is hilarious. As you mentioned, he had friends in high places, which meant that he was protected. Money talks. Positive test results get covered up. There is no way it was a level playing field.
Microchip said:Including the possibility that the outcome in some stages may have been bought.
