LOL!!
To paraphrase the Great Dubya, "you're either for Armstrong, or for Cancer"

LA is a **** for so many other reasons besides doping.
Even if he did dope (you'd have to be pretty naive at this point to think he was pure a driven snow), the bottom line is that the whole field of GC contenders at the time were doped to the gills. LA is essentially going to be punished for being smarter than everyone else. He trained harder and smarter. Period. He probably would have dominated regardless. He had the will and the $$ behind him.
At this point, it all smacks of revenge. Landis et al just want to see LA fall just as they did.
How will this make cycling better? Certainly not for me. Will LA going down make the roads safer for cyclists? No. Will it get more people on bikes? Not likely. Will it pump more cash into cycling? Probably not in North America.
I wish even half of the motivation for going after LA was being put into punishing
those in the banking sector who were responcible for the economic meltdown we have experienced, or going after motorists who take out cyclists.
I guess arguing this in this forum is pretty much the equivelant of standing up in the Vatican and arguing the existence of God though.