- May 27, 2012
- 6,458
- 0
- 0
If the UCI is exposed, the interesting tidbit I would like to see is how the sacrificial lambs who were busted for doping were chosen. Because it always seemed strange how that always shook out.
ChewbaccaD said:Why, the fat baztard who is running the place snuck down to South Africa to race when athletes from his country were banned from doing so. He never has and never will be more than a useless bag of ****.
BroDeal said:The UCI should be preparing the ground for Armstrong being exposed. They have a lot of material to work with. Everyone in the sport is singing the same tune about how different the sport it from four years ago. They have their two new clean champions, Wiggins and Hesjedal. Instead they are digging the hole deeper for themselves.
Now is the time to get ahead of the curve. They should acknowledge that mistakes have been made in the past and make a new anti-doping gesture, like testing and proceedings that are independent of the UCI and independent of nations.
BroDeal said:I find it pretty hilarious that the USADA repeatedly refers to the affair as "The USPS Doping Conspiracy." It is so perfect.
luckyboy said:Each new development is just mindblowing at this point. The UCI's open corruption is staggering also.
I hope that one day there will be a book logging the whole history of this - from 1999, the tests, O'Reilly, the SCA stuff, Anderson.. just every little detail and story up to the end of this investigation gathered together in one place so we can all look back at this.
The claims that cycling is clean now look laughable considering the actions of the hierarchy recently.
BroDeal said:This translates to McQuaid and his cronies are in London as drunk as lords.
BroDeal said:I find it pretty hilarious that the USADA repeatedly refers to the affair as "The USPS Doping Conspiracy." It is so perfect.
"If UCI is truly interested in setting up a special panel to deal with doping, it should not be for one case, rather UCI should ask (the World Anti-Doping Agency) to establish an independent body akin to a Truth And Reconciliation Commission, where the skeletons of doping in cycling can all come out of the closet,
Random Direction said:so, RR, Fat Pat and Hein could be threatening to blackmail those who might, have spoke? Therefore JV's twitter comments because he has been read his lack of rights by Fat Pat? To some it could seem to be a case of corruption at its worst.
This could explode.
Ferminal said:This is big, is this the first time an anti-doping body has publicly stated the UCI has no interest in enforcing anti-doping measures? Maybe AFLD did in the past?
MarkvW said:The UCI is not ASKING, it is TELLING. And it is also telling USA Cycling that its directive controls over any directive of the national federations. I sure hope Python is right when he says that USA Cycling is with USADA on this.
Race Radio said:Fat Pat and Hein's will likely not succeed with this attempt to derail the process but it could delay it. It also serves as a way to introduce chaos into the process. Threats of ignoring any immunity deals and suspending anyone who talks are real. Even if they do not stand up in CAS they would rob a rider of a year and a lot of legal fees.
Hein and Pat know they are in deep do do. They need to toss as many bombs as possible before they go down.
