FoxxyBrown1111 said:I don´t wanna disturb the party, but wasn´t it a pyrrhic victory?
The UCI will not strip him of his titles.
The evidence will not be aired.
So what did we gain??
As Johan fights his own case, the evidence will be aired.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
FoxxyBrown1111 said:I don´t wanna disturb the party, but wasn´t it a pyrrhic victory?
The UCI will not strip him of his titles.
The evidence will not be aired.
So what did we gain??
FitSsikS said:Hey when you look at like that...it's still a record:
7 TDF.....DQs.
BotanyBay said:As Johan fights his own case, the evidence will be aired.
FoxxyBrown1111 said:I don´t wanna disturb the party, but wasn´t it a pyrrhic victory?
The UCI will not strip him of his titles.
The evidence will not be aired.
So what did we gain??
AussieGoddess said:The statement from Lance, and the letter to Bill Bockman are completely contradictory.
Lance says 'I am too tired to fight"
His lawyers say "we arent going to arbitration - but you dont have the jurisdiction to sanction him"
They are not accepting the bans. Not by a long shot.
FoxxyBrown1111 said:The evidence will not be aired.
So what did we gain??
JeffreyPerry said:There was dope before EPO...just because he wasn't around for EPO doesn't mean he was clean.
JeffreyPerry said:
MacRoadie said:Not quite sure why you keep saying that...
Turner29 said:Greg did whatever everyone else did at that time. Also, since EPO was available in 1989, this does not exclude Lemond.
Turner29 said:There are a handful of mostly second-tier riders quoted in that thread, hardly representative of the peloton's views.
BroDeal said:So Armstrong is claiming that he could not go to arbitration because the UCI ordered everyone in cycling not to participate in the process. Yet McQuaid said the UCI accepts the judge's decision.
This will continue on but Armstrong looks to be at a large disadvantage since he opted out of the process. I wonder if at some future time he will be demanding arbitration, saying he wanted to earlier but the UCI forbade it.
eleven said:There was "dope before EPO" in the same way that there was "Stimulant before Crack Cocaine".
eleven said:To be fair, Greg was pre-EPO era in cycling. Unless you believe he had access to EPO or other PEDS before the rest of the peloton, it's hard to think he had an unfair advantage.
LeMond might be an ***, but he was an incredibly talented, gifted, hardworking ***.
JeffreyPerry said:yep and the tool did it, just like everybody else.
Kender said:so how long before we hear from USADA and UCI?