- Oct 25, 2010
- 3,049
- 2
- 0
TourOfSardinia said:Also he chose a busy news day to break his news, didn't he.
Yeah, those fanboyz in NYC will do anything to derail the train.
TourOfSardinia said:Also he chose a busy news day to break his news, didn't he.
WinterRider said:Great! I just turned on British Euro sport and they're really ripping into Lance.
bingo.GJB123 said:Actually they can't. Because of the SOL-issue they have to proof that he conspired to keep his doping secret. Whom did he conspire with? Exactemundo, the UCI. FatPat is toast. I can almost hear his uncontrollable sobbing from where I am sitting.![]()
Benotti69 said:Just like LieStrong, keep the masses docile and believing the myth of wonderboy.
BroDeal said:My guess is that the UCI will get an explanatory sanction document from the USADA and not appeal to CAS. McQuaid is already backpedaling about the UCI trying to aid Armstrong. It will be easier to accept the sanctions and move on. The USADA can probably increase the liklihood of the sanction being accepted by not implicating the UCI in the document.
MarkvW said:McQuaid has kept his mouth shut lately. I'm starting to suspect that he has been ordered to keep his mouth shut.
Armstrong reacts to news that he will be cut out of the new directors cut of Dodgeball.BroDeal said:
hrotha said:Someone photoshop a single tear into that, please.
aphronesis said:Ah, you're kidding right? The Daily News is one of the most reactionary pieces of media going. Any story that keeps the massed docile, resentful and conservative will work for them. The "rest of the media" will no doubt "follow suit" but lets figure that at least a few of them will historicize the issue rather than invoke primordial superstitious values.
thehog said:I like it.... "positive test? Who cares!"
Carl Lewis: "The climate was different then," said Lewis. "Over the years a lot of people will sit around and debate that [the drug] does something. There really is no pure evidence to show that it does something. It does nothing."
BillytheKid said:I think the issue with most of the people is the massive effort to single out Armstrong is unusual. Even to the point of possible deals for the accussers and former teammates. That we don't know for sure, but it is likely. I think it's a sense of fairplay in big picture and how you look at that. Some just don't like him and any means to justice is fine with them. Others see him as no better than the others, but perhaps the means to bring him down as outside the rules of the day. The plot thickens.
CAS may rule one way and the USADA the other? I have know idea.
Dr. Maserati said:Really.
So, NYDN had 2 choices - say LA is the victim of a government conspired witch hunt and he has done a lot of good.
or
That he is a doper, liar and a fraud that has finally been exposed.
Seems they went for the latter.
Don't be late Pedro said:Armstrong reacts to news that he will be cut out of the new directors cut of Dodgeball.
Alpe d'Huez said:Can anyone show me any mainstream news articles that are scoffing at Armstrongs claim that this is a "witch hunt"? Any that directly give credit to USADA? Any that say Armstrong did this because arbitration would show he doped with certainty? Because that is the truth, and I'm not seeing it anywhere in the media. None. They all report Armstrongs nonsensical claims like they are possibly valid and worthy concerns.
Alpe d'Huez said:I see this as only one small step. Armstrongs PR machine has already started and hell fight this in the court of public opinion and lawsuits for some time.
If you read news clips, and comments in the mainstream you can already see this happening.
aphronesis said:Why are those the only two choices? What's with the binary apparatus?
Those that don't care - don't care.aphronesis said:Exposed is a very relative term: one that will differ greatly between you and those who don't care.
@BB: some of us can articulate positions w/o crutch images from the culture industry.
BroDeal said:Caption this.
![]()
frenchfry said:Obviously he hasn't given up, he is just fighting where he has always had the advantage up to now. The volume of intern generated comments is boggling, the only positive is that most of them are so obvious and over the top that a reasonable reader must be able to see through the charade.
Overall, from what I have seen, the press has been pretty objective and isn't giving Armstrong a lot of credibility. From linked articles found on this thread there are some containing pretty scathing attacks on Wonder-boy. On French radio they are already pointing out that his arbitration refusal was a calculated ploy to ensure the truth doesn't get out and that the jurisdiction issue is only a pretext.
His image, already damaged, must be taking a huge hit even if the fanboys and interns clog up the media. I wonder if even he had calculated the intensity of the reaction.
ManInFull said:Well, the description that we always thought would one day be associated with Lance has been thrown out there:
Lance Armstrong is the Great American Sports Cheat. Our greatest ever.
http://msn.foxsports.com/cycling/st...t-against-usada-goes-from-hero-to-zero-082412