He is, and for me rightfully.yourwelcome said:LOL.
Then again, I guess Pantani is revered as a people's hero too.
He is, and for me rightfully.yourwelcome said:LOL.
Then again, I guess Pantani is revered as a people's hero too.
Granville57 said:Wow. I haven't logged in here in months. I must say, the back and forth here is pretty f'ing disappointing. Shouldn't be too surprised, I suppose, based on the downward spiral that this forum has been over the past year or so.
Congratulations to the gate keepers, and especially to those who just can't resist responding to every, single, daily, *** display of idiocy.
Anyway, I'll just leave you with a little observation of my own. You're welcome.
(Actually, Thank You, RR)
GJB123 said:Well I guess the shlt now really has hit the proverbial fan.I can't begin to imagine what the fall out is going to be for existing pro teams, pro riders, DS's, etc.
This will make the Contador-case look like a walk in the park.
Regards
GJ
SilentAssassin said:I don't know cycling is great to watch but a ruling that will have lance stripped of all titles will hurt the sport. Mostly Americans will be turned off from watching pro cycling but that doesn't mean it'll turn them off from participating in cycling.
A lance guilty ruling would mean a lot of people in he USA won't watch cycling. It'll hurt the ratings and maybe sponsorship revenue long term but it won't kill the sport it just won't be aired over here as much which is a raw deal for us americans rooting for the true people's champion denis menchov. Boxing is far more corrupt than cycling. Worst case scenario cycling will continue to be one of those cult sports to watch.
Regardless say what you want about lance but he put cycling on the map. He made the sport popular on a global scale.
If he's guilty I hope he does get his titles stripped. But if the guilty verdict lies mainly with the eyewitness testimonies of dirty riders who have lied in the past, then it will ruin the sport. It sets a precedent that riders can be banned just by pointing the finger at them. Lance is a brash and obnoxious character who has undoubtedly made enemies in the sport. Let's face it he's a cocky American bad asse that put the smack down on all European riders for a decade. If your in the sport as long as lance has been you are bound to have enemies. So I'm not surprised there are witnesses...and that's why you can't rely on witnesses especially if they are the people that have tested positive for doping.
Benotti69 said:they have no one to blame but themselves. Who are the 'clean' teams supposed to be Garmin and Sky? they all have been part of the Arsmtrong/EPO era!
Ferminal said:Where does the USADA charge letter state that it relies on testimony of Landis? Or is every American cyclist who rode for USPS/Disco now a liar too? Did they also lie to USADA when interviewed by them?
hughmoore said:Ok, doesnt say that specifically.
"but it says riders who confessed to doping"
Im not sure if any of these riders denied they doped previously as that would make them liars.
Maybe they are not liars, thats right, Landis is not a liar, he wrote a book saying he didnt doped and now he says he did.
"Did they also lie to USADA when interviewed by them" Who knows, one day they are not dopers and the next day they are, maybe tommorrow they wont dopers.
Sounds a bit wishy washy to me.
Hugh
GJB123 said:I am not making excuses for anyone. Far from it!! I am just musing what the ramifications will be and they will be humongous, me thinks. That's all.
For example, I can't imagine that Contador is sleeping tightly tonight. This could have serious ramifications for him and he is not the only one by any means.
This can be so huge it is actually hard to get your head around it all.
Regards
GJ
GJB123 said:Actually what you are saying is that having lied once, someone cannot be trusted to speak the truth ever again even if corroborated by evidence and statements of those who have never lied. That is a nice and simple world you live in, although isn't a colorless world (i.e. black and white) rather boring after a while?
Regards
GJ
No,Eyeballs Out said:I know this question has probably been asked 100 times before but...
...with all that's lined up against him here, is there any chance that Armstrong coughs to the whole lot ?
GotDropped said:I think I read somewhere, that the federal investigation began just after Floyd came out, and went on for a long time, during that time USADA said that they would wait for the federal investigation to end before they made procedings of their own. That could be the reason for the delay, and maybe before Floyd came out they didn't have the proof (in regards to witnesses and testimony) in order to pursue a case.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
mwbyrd said:But I have to question this. The federal investigation should not have any effect on the USADA determining if someone doped or not. If they had evidence of doping, it should have been made public. Heck, Floyd basically knew 3 days after the tour. Contador within 30 days. And now LA finds out 2 years later??
USADA's job is to enforce doping and providing for clean sport. I don't see how they did their job if they knew about it before the federal investigation ended.
Leopejo said:He is, and for me rightfully.
hughmoore said:No, but people who lie are less reliable witnesses than those who dont.
Where is this corroboration you speak of?
Hugh
Eyeballs Out said:I know this question has probably been asked 100 times before but...
...with all that's lined up against him here, is there any chance that Armstrong coughs to the whole lot ?
ManInFull said:Oh, please do not bring up the tax payer dollars issue. Take your Lance marching orders elsewhere. We blow money on all kinds of crap in the US and blowing a few million to prove that Armstrong is a doper is just fine with me!
WinterRider said:Consistent with is not proof. I think the point is that all of his "passed" tests, are consistent with doping, but were not enough to prove it.
When taken in conjunction with all of the eyewitness testimony though, they must feel it adds value to the case.
thehog said:The reason they didn't act in 2010 was because of the Federal Investigation. They stated this at the time. That they'd wait for its conclusion before acting.
USADA have also being interviewing riders since 09/10 and collecting evidence. They have also been in touch with "bodies" in Europe whom have also passed on evidence.
Lets not get silly here.
WinterRider said:I disagree. If they could have acted they would.
I suspect that when they say the samples are consistent with doping, they do not mean that they prove doping by themselves. So they likely do not classify as positive tests.
You are having a laugh. He had a string of mediocre results for a man who wanted to win the worlds against guys who wouldnt stand a chance. He did win the florida 70.3 event alright but dominate is delusional.hughmoore said:That's because Lance is dominating Tri/Ironman and they are jealous, bring it out now to stop him winning the Kona.
Hugh
Stingray34 said:Really, where is RR? I'm starting to worry.
GJB123 said:Oh and corroboration. The letter speaks of at least 10 former riders and/or employees who have testified against your big hero.
Regards
GJ