- Sep 25, 2009
- 7,527
- 1
- 0
definitely afld under bordry, until now, was the most outspoken national anti-doping body opposing and exposing the uci favouritism to armstrong and his team.Ferminal said:This is big, is this the first time an anti-doping body has publicly stated the UCI has no interest in enforcing anti-doping measures? Maybe AFLD did in the past?
also, since your question is general enough, wada under **** pound should be included in the count.
the documentation covering both organizations feuds with the uci is easily available...
the difference btwn the usada and afld this time is significant.
afld's main quarrel was over who was to oversee the tdf testing. recall, wada's independent observers were instituted eventually and the compromise was found.
the usada though is not in a compromising mood, their aim is exposing deep down, generation long culture of doping in cycling, all under the corrupt uci.
this is an existential fight for fat pat and his predecessor.
