avanti said:
I have not followed USADA story in detail but if both the UCI and USAC think the UCI should be in charge of this investigation then could they decide to ignore whatever USADA concludes at the end of its investigation.
I believe whatever the outcome LA will still be listed as the winner of races he won.
In general I'm finding that LA is ancient news to the public and the media.
If LA is ancient news, then why do companies still sponsor him? Why do corporations still pay to hear his speeches? Why does a cancer awareness foundation still rely on his name for donations?
Because, the liar has gotten away with it.
If you want clean sports, you have to expose the biggest cheater, even if he is retired. If you want clean sports, you have to show that cheating doesn't pay.
To me it doesn't matter whether LA keeps his titles. Barry Bonds has his home run records but he's a pariah. Pete Rose has his hits but he's an autograph-whoring joke. To deter present and future cheaters, LA's history of cheating the sport in a highly organized manner and thwarting the truth in brutal fashion all needs to be fully vetted.