USADA's Reasoned Decision 202 pages

[Benotti69]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/109619079/Reasoned-Decision

202 pages.

This could be the thread to discuss the document.

 

[Bavarianrider]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/109619079/Reasoned-Decision

202 pages.

This could be the thread to discuss the document.

What about the 880 other pages?

 

[Big Daddy]

Wow! If this is legit then Armstrong needs to get tarred and feathers. Fast forward to p38 of the document. Gets very interesting.

 

[Big Daddy]

What about the 880 other pages?

Certainly they are saving that for the upcoming arbitration for Bruyneel and some of Lance's dope doctors. And also, a big chunk in there must be for Pat McQuaid if he wants to say some BS.

 

[mikkemus23]

So he bullied poor Levi and his wife too. *******.

 

[Benotti69]

What about the 880 other pages?

To be released at a future date. Patience oh Rider from Bavaria and rewarded you shall be

 

[webvan]

Wow! If this is legit then Armstrong needs to get tarred and feathers. Fast forward to p38 of the document. Gets very interesting.

P.38 ? The blood withdrawal in Spain before the 2000 Tour ? That was in Tyler's book, with a bit more detail actually, like the separate room for Dopestrong.

What's that reference to 880 more pages ? Did Trygard say his report had 1082 pages ? No wonder it took them so long!

 

[Ninety5rpm]

What about the 880 other pages?

I presume that's the supporting evidence.

 

[Big Daddy]

So he bullied poor Levi and his wife too. *******.

This! Add another couple to the list Armstrong has threatened.

 

[webvan]

What page for Levi ?

Check this out, page 45, Trygart must have had a good laugh writing that :

While USADA has not charged Armstrong with an anti-doping rule violation for the useof Actovegin because the product is not currently banned, Armstrong’s conduct and falsestatements in relation to Actovegin are highly relevant. It should be kept in mind thatArmstrong’s and the team’s cover up concerning Actovegin was made in response to an official French law enforcement investigation. The fact that Armstrong and team officials were willing to make false statements in the course of a law enforcement investigation regarding dopingdirectly bears on evaluation of the credibility of their statements regarding the use of other products. In other words, if Lance Armstrong was willing to lie about Actovegin—and heclearly did lie about Actovegin— there is little reason to believe that Armstrong would not be willing to lie about other products and with regard to other topics.

 

[Wallace]

This is interesting:
"Mark Fabiani, acting on behalf of Lance Armstrong, issued his unambiguous denial of a professional relationship betweenArmstrong and Ferrari and said that Armstrong and Ferrari had not seen each other in a year.Fabiani’s statement on behalf of Armstrong was a lie."

I'm not a lawyer, but can't you get disbarred for this kind of thing?

 

[thehog]

This is interesting:
"Mark Fabiani, acting on behalf of Lance Armstrong, issued his unambiguous denial of a professional relationship betweenArmstrong and Ferrari and said that Armstrong and Ferrari had not seen each other in a year.Fabiani’s statement on behalf of Armstrong was a lie."

I'm not a lawyer, but can't you get disbarred for this kind of thing?

Not if he is acting in good faith with information from his client.

 

[webvan]

FatPat pwned :

Page | 52
headquarters in Aigle in May 2002 and offered at least $100,000 to help the development of cycling.

UCI vehemently denies that this meeting or payment was, as Mr. Armstrong told Mr.Hamilton and Mr. Landis, tied to a cover-up of the 2001 Tour de Suisse sample. In any case, what is important for the case is that substantial parts of Mr. Hamilton’s and Mr. Landis’s recollections of Mr. Armstrong’s statements have been corroborated.

 

[Wallace]

Not if he is acting in good faith with information from his client.

Got it. Thank you. Too bad.

 

[WinterRider]

This is interesting:
"Mark Fabiani, acting on behalf of Lance Armstrong, issued his unambiguous denial of a professional relationship betweenArmstrong and Ferrari and said that Armstrong and Ferrari had not seen each other in a year.Fabiani’s statement on behalf of Armstrong was a lie."

I'm not a lawyer, but can't you get disbarred for this kind of thing?

Not if your client misled you.

 

[tofino]

Need to see UCI stuff

Would be great to see the UCI stuff confirmed by more than riders. Anything else about the UCI???

 

[Berzin]

Forget Wikileaks-this has my vote for "Document of the Year".

 

[hiero2]

Personally, I think this is a duplication of "The Evidence" thread. Benotti posted a link in "Links Only" to the 202 pages - glad somebody posted it!

 

[Cloxxki]

Italian coppers joined in! Some good stuff might be in there, for the full version.

And poor Zabriskie, he got his punishment in his crashed. Broke his youth vows to never dope.

 

[The Gnome]

Armstrong texts Levi's wife after LL. testified : "run don't walk"

big tough guy eh Tex?

 

[yakhillclimb]

Ding **** the witch is dead

 

[webvan]

So according to the PR http://fr.scribd.com/doc/109607300/Press-Release-Armstrong-Reasoned-Decision-10-10-12 the evidence will be on their site later today ?

 

[python]

i am having one of the best days...reading the document.

other than a myriad of thoughts, i am trying to calculate how many new law suits are coming armstrong's way. so far i 've estimated about 5-6. poor guy

 

[The Cobra]

This is gold. Pure gold!

 

[Benotti69]

i am having one of the best days...reading the document.

other than a myriad of thoughts, i am trying to calculate how many new law suits are coming armstrong's way. so far i 've estimated about 5-6. poor guy

Sounds like a topic for a new thread