Craigee said:
fmk_RoI said:
Varnish
loses.
Details
In a short statement, her management team said: "Judgement was received at 1700 today and it has been found that Jess Varnish was neither an employee or a worker of either British Cycling or UK Sport."
The statement concluded by saying the 28-year-old, who is due to give birth to her first child this week, and her legal team will digest the 43-page judgement before issuing further comment.
Just big wigs looking out for fellow big wigs. How it is even possible in 2019 for taxes being used to be paid to an athlete as their income without them having any employment protection or any rights at all is corruption. Nothing else. So the sackings of all the coaches was just in reply to the perception BC was coming across with. They never had to sack anyone because the athletes have no rights? Maybe they should sue BC for unfair dismissals. Democracy huh. What a joke.
What are you talking about? I fundamentally disagree with you. *Edited by King Boonen*
If you are fortunate to be top level at a sport then if governing bodies want the best results it is reasonable that you should get given a grant of money to enable you to maximise your training by not having to work. That's it. You're not employed. They don't owe you anything. You turn up, perform, the best people get picked for the squad and given a grant, the even better people get picked for the team on the day. If you are no longer good enough to be picked you don't get to be in the squad and you don't get a grant to enable you to train without working.
Otherwise we just revert back to amateur status, where you have a job and try and train around that.
But that it, two options. And even in football which is more like a business, you can't sue if a team drops you for being no good anymore.