EnacheV said:
Ill be honest, by my standards, i made a troll post but i can chuckle from time to time considering is free season for troll threads.
If the same immense amount of pointless drivels would be thrown at Nibali/Astana i would defend him to.
The only point that stands is that the italian officials proved they are willing to cover up Nibali, compared to france ones that seems to be happy throwing french riders under the bus.
Dude, the only reason "immense amounts of pointless drivel(s)" are not thrown at Nibali/Astana is simply because basically everyone is in agreement that he/they are doping. Thus not much discussion. I suggest you take up Nibali's defense with the same mindless enthusiasm that you have directed towards Froome's defense, maybe then you will be happy when everyone responds and slams Nibali as a doper as well.
You really don't see a difference between:
<Nibali dopes, he has connections with Ferrari etc. Rides for Astana for Vino, no way he's clean.>
<yup>
<true that>
<hard to argue with that>
<crickets>
AND:
<Froome dopes, came from no where, Leinders, marginal gains is a euphemism, etc.>
CUE: A veritable s#it storm of arguments the majority of which sound like they were lifted straight from the Lance Fan Playbook.
Come on, really?