klodifan said:Jens Voigt is the conscience of cycling:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/tdf2009/columns/story?id=4344207
That was a great article. Thanks for the link
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
klodifan said:Jens Voigt is the conscience of cycling:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/tdf2009/columns/story?id=4344207
klodifan said:Jens Voigt is the conscience of cycling:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/tdf2009/columns/story?id=4344207
Actually it looks more like the dip caught him off-guard and threw him up and forward (just before you can see his butt thrown off the saddle). This puts most of his weight on the front wheel when in a high-speed turn and on the paint line. Remember also that he had just put in a heck of an effort, and could have been a bit of oxygen deprivation, or light headed.Thoughtforfood said:The cause of the crash is whatever caused the wheel to move left be it slippage, a rolled tubular, or a blow-out. It was not caused because his right hand came off the bars and you can clearly see it didn't happen because his left hand came off. Something else caused the wreck.
Thoughtforfood said:Watching it again, I think it might be as simple as a rolled front tubular or blow out.
Thoughtforfood said:Watching it again, I think it might be as simple as a rolled front tubular or blow out.
klodifan said:Jens Voigt is the conscience of cycling:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/tdf2009/columns/story?id=4344207
Thoughtforfood said:Because you rest your weight on your hands and for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Meaning what goes up, comes down, and because coming down has consequences based on the fact that once the hand begins moving in that direction, it wouldn't stop until it hit something and he wouldn't crash unless he missed the bars on the way down.
You say it is obvious, but here is your problem: You cannot see his left hand because of his body, ergo, it is not clear what happened. Physics suggest you are wrong.
EDIT: I just watched it for the 20th time, and his hand becomes dislodged AFTER the event that caused the accident. His hand ONLY becomes dislodged because the wheel was turned to the left. The cause of the crash is whatever caused the wheel to move left be it slippage, a rolled tubular, or a blow-out. It was not caused because his right hand came off the bars and you can clearly see it didn't happen because his left hand came off. Something else caused the wreck.
Maybe it is as simple as his front tire lost contact with the road and came down on the line? Either way, it was not because his hands came off the bars. That CLEARLY doesn't happen until he is already falling.
weremichael said:Well written article about my favorite cyclist.
My wife and I were really sad to see him crash out so horrendously today.
I hope Jens recovers quickly enough to ride in the Tour of Germany.
Thoughtforfood said:how long is a piece of string?
(by the way, you care enough to post about it, which belies your suggestion that you care not a bit. That psychology thingy works like a charm.)
bikeGURU said:Sorry, he was moving his left hand from the hoods to the drops just as he went over the bump in the road and was probably a little off balance because of that and the wheel pulled out on the painted line for some reason and he crashed. It is very clear that he was moving his left hand just before the crash happened. If his weight was a little off balance on the bars from moving his hands the bump would have jerked the wheel under him and at that speed not much needs to happen to pitch the rider off the bike.
Using Boeing as foil....Boeing said:I have watched this over and over and it looks like he hts a small bumpt