- Jul 16, 2010
- 17,455
- 5
- 0
VDB has been doing rather well in the 2 races he entered this season
Not Andy Schleck anymore it seems!
Not Andy Schleck anymore it seems!
I wonder how he will do in Pais Vasco. In this form and with his improved ITT he might have a chance to win. Although I think his lack of explosiveness might bother him in the hardest stage.El Pistolero said:VDB has been doing rather well in the 2 races he entered this season![]()
Not Andy Schleck anymore it seems!
Dekker_Tifosi said:I wonder how he will do in Pais Vasco. In this form and with his improved ITT he might have a chance to win. Although I think his lack of explosiveness might bother him in the hardest stage.
This year's edition isn't really for the explosive guys.Dekker_Tifosi said:I wonder how he will do in Pais Vasco. In this form and with his improved ITT he might have a chance to win. Although I think his lack of explosiveness might bother him in the hardest stage.
His attacks hardly shed anyone though (heck it was Gesink who closed the gap on him in the 5th stage even in current form). But when others attack he can follow really well (seemingly without trouble)theyoungest said:This year's edition isn't really for the explosive guys.
Plus I think VDB is fairly explosive, it's on the really long climbs that I have my doubts about him.
Ryo Hazuki said:jvdb has always had unexplosive attacks. he however seems to improve where gesink is at the same level he was in andalucia. beloki anyone?
Well if he isn't any better in Pais Vasco...Ryo Hazuki said:jvdb has always had unexplosive attacks. he however seems to improve where gesink is at the same level he was in andalucia. beloki anyone?
classicomano said:Come on, Beloki was out for like a year before even attempting to race and withdrew after the first stage because of the pain. Gesink was back on his bike training 2 months after his crash.
Ryo Hazuki said:so? it doesn't matter how quickly you return from injury but wether or not you get back on your old level. to me it isn't looking like gesink is improving anything and he's been doing full trainings since december and racing since mid february. beloki came back in early 2004 and eventually raced full time but never really got back to his old level. it also becomes a mental thing of course and beloki subsequently retired.
theyoungest said:Sure, he's the new Beloki. Just like Breschel would never do anything again.
His first WT race, and he's not quite up to his old levelHe clearly improved throughout the week. Andalucia doesn't tell us much regarding form, as we've seen from Vanendert, for instance.
theyoungest said:Are you, by any chance, an Aussie?
theyoungest said:A guy like Cunego wouldn't have been given a 2 minute headstart.
briztoon said:Doesn't answer my question. Do people here see Albasini as an undeserved winner?
briztoon said:Doesn't answer my question. Do people here see Albasini as an undeserved winner?
briztoon said:Yes, I am Aussie.
Doesn't answer my question. Do people here see Albasini as an undeserved winner?
No. He hasn't. He had a knee injury which is solved, otherwise you don't ride like this. You seem to think such an injury is the death knell to a cyclist's career, but knee problems are quite common in the peloton.Ryo Hazuki said:breschel has been on and of injuries forever now. same thing.
Any evidence for this? He looked good to me in Gent-Wevelgem. maybe not as good as in 2010 but what did you expect with hardly any racing last year. Look at Haussler last year, he couldn't get to the front in any race. Now there's a guy who never got back to his old level.he's not nearly back to his old level. more chance he will get injured again down the road.
No, it's a tainted win because the organisers dropped the ball completely. Albasini deserved to win by taking the opportunities that were given to him. He's a pretty decent climber and I can't believe they gave him as much rope as they did, even when thinking that the Port-Ainé stage would go ahead.briztoon said:I'm sorry, is it a tainted win because it's Michael Albasini? who many here have alluded to as not being a worthy winner. If it was some one such as Damiano Cuenego would others have been as critical of the winner?
Yeah, there was one screw up of a stage, but that really comes down to the race organisers, and not the riders. What happened, happened, congratulate Albasini and GreenEDGE and move on.
This, although I do feel that 1'32" to Albasini was frighteningly generous. He could have podiumed or top 5ed with that kind of advantage as motivation to hold on, definitely.theyoungest said:No. I've noticed that the people who can bear no criticism regarding Albasini's win are all Aussies, that's why I asked.
Albasini did great to hold on, but we all know that without the free time bonus he got on stage one, and with the MTF included, he wouldn't have won. Simple as that.
Quite so.stefank said:"Simple" is best used as a description of those who allowed Albasini a 1'32" lead.
No, they just see this as a race that really didn't deserve to be doling out the WT points that it is.briztoon said:Yes, I am Aussie.
Doesn't answer my question. Do people here see Albasini as an undeserved winner?
hatcher said:Not at all.
The others really have no excuse for not chasing down his break.
Froome19 said:Yes they do...
How should they know that the queen stage would be cancelled?
hatcher said:Well the possibility was mentioned during the stage thread on this very forum, so it shouldn't be too much to expect pro teams to have thought of the possibility.
Why take the risk of giving a very good climber a 92 second head start anyway? Put a rider or two on the front for 20k and bring them back. It was needlessly risky, and it serves them right that they were caught out.
Ryo Hazuki said:yes. god what an idiots for not checking thuis forum. not until the final moments of the canceled stage the organisers had NO plans of even altering the stage. so how would they know![]()
Let me quote Sean Yates to you, from the first day in Catalunya:Ryo Hazuki said:yes. god what an idiots for not checking thuis forum. not until the final moments of the canceled stage the organisers had NO plans of even altering the stage. so how would they know![]()
Yes but the GC teams seemed to be adjusting to the race and I think they were suprised by how good Albasini was, he was miles better than anyone in the break and the GC riders could have saved energy and missed the sprint with no damage if it wasnt for Albasini's strength, you would have never put any odds on him for stage 2 before stage1 would you?hatcher said:Well the possibility was mentioned during the stage thread on this very forum, so it shouldn't be too much to expect pro teams to have thought of the possibility.
Why take the risk of giving a very good climber a 92 second head start anyway? Put a rider or two on the front for 20k and bring them back. It was needlessly risky, and it serves them right that they were caught out.
hatcher said:Not at all.
The others really have no excuse for not chasing down his break.
