Barf. Too bad he can't reject it.The new Remco
![]()
Barf. Too bad he can't reject it.The new Remco
![]()
Something about worst trade deal in history of trade deals?The new Remco
![]()
Hayter looked really strong on the MTF in Tirreno (despite the headwind). I'm curious the see what he'll do on the coming stages.
For me it is both, specially now that you highlighted that interpretation and there is no inherent negation between the two.My point was actually far more a criticism than an excuse. But people will read what they like.
Sorry, it was a lame pun on the acronym you used.?
![]()
Ethan Hayter’s early season ambitions hit by fractured collarbone
Ineos Grenadiers rider to miss European Track Championshipwww.cyclingnews.com
he didn't race since
Interestingly, Spanish tv seemed to do the same. We only saw images of an angry Evenepoel, we didn't get to see the winner.Interesting to note the predominant discourse: Remco lost, not Rogla won.
You can clearly see the pain in his eyes from having to wear that instead of his rainbowsThe new Remco
![]()
I can. Plenty of people made the exact same consideration. It is a simple observation. He was badly positioned, this is a fact and nobody's fault but his own (unless there are things i'm not aware of). Had he not made that mistake, he could have won. Had Evenepoel not made that mistake and won, people would likely have said Roglic was at the front too early and otherwise could have won. It would also have been true and had he not been, he in that case could have won. But it's a good thing that you had me write a longer post for basically no good reason, because any sane person could see with their own eyes that Evenepoel was badly placed, which cost him the win. But i know other people on the forum like my overly long posts when dragged into obnoxious discussions, so it's all good.For me it is both, specially now that you highlighted that interpretation and there is no inherent negation between the two.
But as you also implied... you can't hold it against the people to whom the "excuse" interpretation was more striking ;D
The best Carapaz could've made it a three-way sprint. Why does he start his season this late by the way?Carapaz 10 seconds. A little rusty. Even Uran came in the front group.
I was thinking about Ciccone actually, but had a total brainfart and typed Hayer, no idea how that happened...You are thinking of Tao Geoghegan Hart. Hayter won’t be able to live with the best on the climbs here.
You can clearly see the pain in his eyes from having to wear that instead of his rainbows
Should we call someone?I was thinking about Ciccone actually, but had a total brainfart and typed Hayer, no idea how that happened...
I don't think he has to? There's a UCI rule kicking about somewhere that secondary jerseys don't have to be worn ahead of the rainbows, unless that's changed?
And that makes him a winner. No wheelsucking....just smart tactics and 300 meters of power NO ONE matched.Remco ought to have been on van Wilder's wheel, but somehow got lost in the run-in to the line. By the time he opened up his sprint on the right, he had to cross over on the left, increasing the distance to the finish, and then ran out of road to overtake Roglic. Although he was surprisingly fast, which indicates his condition must be very good indeed.
By contrast, Roglic was led out perfectly by teammates, but hit the front early with like 300 meters to go. Yet this proved ok, since the run-in to the finish was slightly uphill. Roglic basically positioned himself perfectly and that's what got him the win.
Rogla hit the front far too early, but managed to sustain his sprint pretty well. Remco was a bit too far back, which might have helped him push a little less power from 1k to go to 250m to go, but then he had to make up some distance to reach Rogla's wheel. I believe Rogla hitting the front a bit too early is a bigger hinderence than Remco's position, but it was a nice sprint at the end nonetheless. Bring on the next stages.Remco ought to have been on van Wilder's wheel, but somehow got lost in the run-in to the line. By the time he opened up his sprint on the right, he had to cross over on the left, increasing the distance to the finish, and then ran out of road to overtake Roglic. Although he was surprisingly fast, which indicates his condition must be very good indeed.
By contrast, Roglic was led out perfectly by teammates, but hit the front early with like 300 meters to go. Yet this proved ok, since the run-in to the finish was slightly uphill. Roglic basically positioned himself perfectly and that's what got him the win.
I was thinking about Nibali and how much he’d be laughing about these two going all in for Catalunya.I was thinking about Ciccone actually, but had a total brainfart and typed Hayer, no idea how that happened...
If only he had worn airbags when he crashed.to be fair, it's Hayter's first race back after breaking his collarbone at CEGORR
I'll admit to having no good reason for debating with you, but that's just me, I often debate for the sake of it, I guess you know for the future, but from what I can tell, you often can't help yourself not to debate either.I can. Plenty of people made the exact same consideration. It is a simple observation. He was badly positioned, this is a fact and nobody's fault but his own (unless there are things i'm not aware of). Had he not made that mistake, he could have won. Had Evenepoel not made that mistake and won, people would likely have said Roglic was at the front too early and otherwise could have won. It would also have been true and had he not been, he in that case could have won. But it's a good thing that you had me write a longer post for basically no good reason, because any sane person could see with their own eyes that Evenepoel was badly placed, which cost him the win. But i know other people on the forum like my overly long posts when dragged into obnoxious discussions, so it's all good.
How does wheelsucking even come up in responding to my post? First of all, in a sprint to the line it's not called "wheelsucking," but "positioning." Secondly, Evenepoel indeed matched Roglic in power over the last 300 meters, but only was badly positioned and thus started way too far back. Roglic played it perfectly, so chapeau, although he was lucky too, because had Evenepoel been better positioned it's likely that the Belgian would have claimed victory, since he was faster.And that makes him a winner. No wheelsucking....just smart tactics and 300 meters of power NO ONE matched.
Looking forward to tomorrow!How does wheelsucking even come up in responding to my post? First of all in a sprint to the line, it's not called "wheelsucking," but "positioning." Secondly, Evenepoel indeed matched Roglic in power over the last 300 meters, but only was badly positioned and thus started way too far back. Roglic played it perfectly, so chapeau, although he was lucky too, because had Evenepoel been better positioned it's likely that the Belgian would have claimed victory, since he was faster.
Roglic has more experience with these his almost signature, trademark finishes. However, tomorrow is a MTF at over 2100 meters. So this will be the first real test for those wanting to win this Vuelta a Catalunya.
2022 jai Hindley win Giro and was 13th overall in catalunyaI was thinking about Nibali and how much he’d be laughing about these two going all in for Catalunya.
Not likely, sorry. Roglic hit the front early yes, but the error was mitigated by the road rising to the line, which made it harder to come around him in the end. And Remco wasn't just a bit back, but terribly positioned to come through for the win.Rogla hit the front far too early, but managed to sustain his sprint pretty well. Remco was a bit too far back, which might have helped him push a little less power from 1k to go to 250m to go, but then he had to make up some distance to reach Rogla's wheel. I believe Rogla hitting the front a bit too early is a bigger hinderence than Remco's position, but it was a nice sprint at the end nonetheless. Bring on the next stages.