The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
durtyfat said:Do you have any proofs to support that? Don't tell me he can do better over 3 weeks just because he won the Dauphiné. Martin+Hesjedal are probably the best duo in the peloton. By that, i mean that they are really big friends and in addition, they won many races because they were helping each other, something that Talansky never did( Vaughters stated during the TDF that Talansky has to be more close to his teammates and communicates more with them, something like that).
Prediction for Garmin-Sharp in the Vuelta:
Hesjedal= podium( Yes, i believe it. The route suits him very well.)
Martin= top10( 1 stage win)
Talansky= top15
durtyfat said:Do you have any proofs to support that? Don't tell me he can do better over 3 weeks just because he won the Dauphiné. Martin+Hesjedal are probably the best duo in the peloton. By that, i mean that they are really big friends and in addition, they won many races because they were helping each other, something that Talansky never did( Vaughters stated during the TDF that Talansky has to be more close to his teammates and communicates more with them, something like that).
Prediction for Garmin-Sharp in the Vuelta:
Hesjedal= podium( Yes, i believe it. The route suits him very well.)
Martin= top10( 1 stage win)
Talansky= top15
riders are all that matters.Descender said:Now the only thing we need is a proper route!
you must be kidding right?durtyfat said:Do you have any proofs to support that? Don't tell me he can do better over 3 weeks just because he won the Dauphiné. Martin+Hesjedal are probably the best duo in the peloton. By that, i mean that they are really big friends and in addition, they won many races because they were helping each other, something that Talansky never did( Vaughters stated during the TDF that Talansky has to be more close to his teammates and communicates more with them, something like that).
Prediction for Garmin-Sharp in the Vuelta:
Hesjedal= podium( Yes, i believe it. The route suits him very well.)
Martin= top10( 1 stage win)
Talansky= top15
JRTK73 said:Does anyone actually think Contador will win or are we just voting for him?
And you believe that? His crashes in the Tour were painful ones, did he break anything? What about Froome's injuries? => Will Froome even be going for GC after all his crashes at the Tour?Afrank said:Will Talansky even be going for GC after all his crashes at the Tour? iirc Vaughters said the leaders would be Martin and Ryder.
BizarreAkuryo said:Wow, Contador, Evans and Betancur are in the poll for the win and Uran is not. Mick Jagger does not get a lot of love here.
I know he may well lose against Quintana and/or Froome, but come on. Betancur is rated above Uran? Really, in his "shape" (quite round)?![]()
ILovecycling said:riders are all that matters.
cineteq said:And you believe that? His crashes in the Tour were painful ones, did he break anything? What about Froome's injuries? => Will Froome even be going for GC after all his crashes at the Tour?
Bizarre![]()
Hmmm...not very strong arguments, but you're free to believe that. You gotta remember that I predicted Froome would DNF the TourAfrank said:Froomes a higher class of rider, he's the teams top rider that is expected to be ready to lead. Talansky's still young and in development. So is not expected to automatically be thrown back into the leader position after crashing out of a race. So not really comparable IMO.
Besides, it was already set that Hesjedal and Martin would lead before the Tour. It would be a little unfair to tell them now that Talansky's going to be leader and you have to work for them.
Maybe they should just let the road decide. Each have the palmares to justify a free role.
Your prediction was wrong then as he did start the Tour.cineteq said:Hmmm...not very strong arguments, but you're free to believe that. You gotta remember that I predicted Froome would DNS the Tour![]()
cineteq said:Hmmm...not very strong arguments, but you're free to believe that. You gotta remember that I predicted Froome would DNS the Tour![]()
Correct, I mistyped DNF, which was exactly I what meantNetserk said:Your prediction was wrong then as he did start the Tour.
My arguments are simple. JV is not stupid. Talansky is the best rider Garmin has, and don't think his injuries are that bad. Also I don't believe he'll be supporting Hesjedal and/or Martin. I don't care what he or Garmin said to the media. On the other hand, I think Froome's injuries are going to prevent him from performing at a high level (similar to Contador's), thus resulting similar to Froome's 2012 Vuelta.Afrank said:It's clearly a better argument then anything you can come up with, as no argument is the weakest type of argument.![]()
ILovecycling said:*deleted by mod*
Sorry really,I thought you would guess what I meant.You brought my statement to the extreme.Of course you cannot have twenty one flat stages and climber winning it.Descender said:Instead of insulting me, please try to actually engage in a conversation with me. If riders are all that matters, then why should we bother looking for mountains? Why not do 21 flat stages? Arguments, please.
LaFlorecita said:I believe!
Alberto for the win!
Talansky is not the best rider in Garmin-Sharp. However, he has the most potential between him, Hesjedal and Martin in the stage races. JV also stated that Talansky will not reach the level he had in the Dauphiné and its logical. The objectives were planned at the beginning of the year( Martin leader at the Giro, Talansky-Tour and Hesjedal-Vuelta). Martin and Talansky both withdrew in their respective races, the leader should be Hesjedal. Now, i hope that Garmin will animate the mountain stages in the Vuelta like they did in the last year TDF.cineteq said:My arguments are simple. JV is not stupid. Talansky is the best rider Garmin has, and don't think his injuries are that bad. Also I don't believe he'll be supporting Hesjedal and/or Martin. I don't care what he or Garmin said to the media. On the other hand, I think Froome's injuries are going to prevent him from performing at a high level (similar to Contador's), thus resulting similar to Froome's 2012 Vuelta.
ILovecycling said:Sorry really,I thought you would guess what I meant.You brought my statement to the extreme.Of course you cannot have twenty one flat stages and climber winning it.
edit: but imo in normal conditions its not important if you have 3 or 9 mountains stages,or 3 or 11 MTF,how entertaining it is ,is all about riders.
Check 2012 Vuelta,great race,but sh:t parcours