• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Vuelta 2017, Stage 6 :Villareal to Sagunto 204.4 km

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
BVh2eS.gif
 
Re: Re:

Jagartrott said:
Pharazon said:
Jagartrott said:
Froome looked lost without teammates. Why did he not work with Contador from the beginning? Pffft.

because there was 40km left to go and the gap was tiny.

he's not an idiot
If he'd have fully worked with Contador uphill, they could've reached the leaders on the downhill and work together with them. But no, control, control, control.
Why bother though? No need for Froome to take the kind of risks on the descent to keep Nibali or Aru at bay. And even then, probably wouldn't have had enough to hold off on the flat.

Contador is way down in the GC before we've had any proper mountains - he understandably is prepared to gamble - for Froome though the risk is greater than the potential reward.
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Jagartrott said:
Pharazon said:
Jagartrott said:
Froome looked lost without teammates. Why did he not work with Contador from the beginning? Pffft.

because there was 40km left to go and the gap was tiny.

he's not an idiot
If he'd have fully worked with Contador uphill, they could've reached the leaders on the downhill and work together with them. But no, control, control, control.
Why bother though? No need for Froome to take the kind of risks on the descent to keep Nibali or Aru at bay. And even then, probably wouldn't have had enough to hold off on the flat.

Contador is way down in the GC before we've had any proper mountains - he understandably is prepared to gamble - for Froome though the risk is greater than the potential reward.
Exactly. No risk. Control.
 
Re: Re:

Forever The Best said:
Forever The Best said:
Meh. Looks like Contador won't even gain time on De La Cruz and Van Garderen...
Btw, De la Cruz and Van Garderen aren't rivals of Contador but their teams will probably chase Contador when he attacks since they are ahead of him on GC atm, that's why those two losing time is important for Contador.

Anyways, Van Garderen very unlucky today, a bad crash :(
Also just realized that TVG was in the Contador group when he crashed, very strong, yet loses time due to bad luck :(
(I didn't catch most of the climb, I only opened the channel when I read here that Contador was attacking, I thought TVG was in the Nibali/Aru Gr. before the crash)
 
Nov 29, 2010
2,326
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

Jagartrott said:
Exactly. No risk. Control.

It's always been his strategy. Froome not wearing leaders jersey = random Froome attacks. If in leaders jersey, control and wait for TT. Usually he's not in the leaders jersey at the vuelta though. But yea it would've not been a smart move to ride against a group of 15 with 40km still to go for probably no time gain.
 

TRENDING THREADS