Timmy-loves-Rabo said:Well vuelta organizers wanted to return to spring, I think we could be confident they'd have a better lien up of climbing with that. But of course that will never happen. I don't know if i even like the idea, but you can't blame them for disliking the spot they have.
Libertine Seguros said:Yea, there are more than enough climbs in Spain to create far more gaps than the beloved 20+km @ 5% grinds in France. It's just that the Vuelta doesn't use them or doesn't utilise them to their best potential (i.e. one-climb stages or, as with the stupendously hard Ancares, not close enough to the finish to be effective). To give the organisers their credit they have been introducing new and difficult climbs recently (Anglirú, Cotobello, Farrapona, La Pandera, Valdepeñas de Jaén) as well as returning to long-forgotten ones (Peña Cabarga).
Also, announced just now, they're going to Andorra - but not climbing the usual ones of Arcalis, Ordino, Pal or even Naturlandía La Rabassa (which they brought in in 2008).
No, instead they're going to Coll de la Gallina de Sant Julià de Lorià (7km, 8,3%, max. 18%). This is reported to be in stage 8, with stage 9 thus beginning in Andorra La Vella and travelling back into Catalunya (Coll de Pal please!!!).
http://www.elperiodicdandorra.ad/esports/14669-la-nova-joia-de-la-vuelta.html
Libertine Seguros said:Galibier, Croix de Fer, Aubisque (Soulor side), Marie-Blanque, Piau Engaly, Bonette? All long and ca. 5% or less.
I'd hope for them to do something like La Rabassa first, for sure, but I don't expect them to. Still, 7km @ 8,3% is probably enough to open up at least some gaps, and as that will be the weekend, I hope they have a tough mountain stage into Catalunya the day after (as I said before, fingers crossed for Coll de Pal).
Rumours also have them doing País Vasco again, so that would be really good imo as it means we would get hilly week 1 stages and no lengthy flat stages to open. I guess they would either loop south from Pamplona then up through País Vasco and back across to Andorra, or directly west into País Vasco then south and across.
roundabout said:Periodic d'Andorra referenced in biciciclismo mentions a loop in Andorra from the southern border to Canillo and back to Andorra la Vella over Ordino and then the final climb.
http://www.biciciclismo.com/cas/site/noticias-ficha.asp?id=44728
airstream said:Nothing special, but yet better than customary Andorra junk.![]()
c&cfan said:riders make the race. fortunately not all GC contenders are andy-like. some will give a show no matter how dull or great the vuelta is. cobo vs anton vs contador vs j-rod vs nibali vs mosquera???? can you imagine????????!!!!!fireworks!!!!!!
bring it on![]()
airstream said:Do all your posts bold down to Contador and Schleck? Undoubtedly, it's all about riders. Yeah, not all that hard MTF like Pal can bring a great show as well, but it happens rarely, as many factors should add up. Anton and Mosquera felt super, Nibali was very good, Rodriguez dropped in a very severe way, that created a a strong contrast. It was an excellent spectacle. But more often we need really difficult climbs that climbers have possibility to show themselves at their best.![]()
OK. How would have you reacted on this year Vuelta, if Cobo couldn't have participated?c&cfan said:not really. if guys like contador wasn't there, guys like andy would never attack. this is funny, because he knows that he will always loose if he does not attack.
restart.
airstream said:OK. How would have you reacted on this year Vuelta, if Cobo couldn't have participated?
In fact there couldn't have been anyone to attack. Or fireworks!!!!!!happen on the Vuelta by default?
apmfbs said:as usual the vuelta doens´t chose a good option, they know rabassa very well and instead of it the go by ordino-canillo.............
I don´t understand
airstream said:Nothing special, but yet better than customary Andorra junk.![]()
apmfbs said:as usual the vuelta doens´t chose a good option, they know rabassa very well and instead of it the go by ordino-canillo.............
I don´t understand
The Hitch said:Spring. Oh, thats a horrible idea.
Vuelta is far better in September. It gives us a longer season rather than mess with the classics. It gets a better lineup. It also gives very high temperatures which helps give it its own identity as a Grand Tour, rather than just - that other one.
No one would go for the Giro Vuelta double anymore.
And arent some of the climbs still in snow in April?
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:I don't disagree, I like the 3 GTs in the place but like I said vuelta get the worst spot, where it is common for mass-exodus due to worlds prep. Too often this race gets the left overs. Anyway I still like the Vuelta, riders make the race.
Luke Schmid said:How about something a bit more radical, swap the worlds and the Vuelta. Riders would not pull out of the Vuelta to do the worlds. Put the worlds on the week ending on the last weekend in August and start the Vuelta in the first weekend in September. Vattenfalls and Plouay forward one week and riders can use Denmark or Burgos then Eneco or Vattenfalls and Plouay as a build up to Worlds. Even Portugal could be used as a lead up to the worlds or even the Vuelta which might give it a bit of a boost with a bit more interest from teams.
Kvinto said:Vuelta's problem with a prestige is the problem with its self-identification first of all. The Tour is the oldest of GTs, the original GT in the end. The identification of Giro is the cruellest mountains, you may contest it for hours but winning the Tour doesn't guarantee the win in Giro. But what is the Vuelta, especially now when it's being organized by ASO? What could make it special? I dunno, but so far (without it) the only purpose of Vuelta (and i don't see how it could change in future) is letting those who is not capable of winning the Tour/Giro (those who failed at the Tour/Giro) show themselves (save their season).
