I was going to say...The contrast in effort between Kuss and Froome is interesting
I was going to say...The contrast in effort between Kuss and Froome is interesting
Carapaz is wonderfully aggressive when he doesn't attack yesterday despite needing to take timeHe's wonderful to have as a top level contender. Constantly trying to find ways to attack
It's very simple. Froome isn't gonna be much help on the Angliru anyway. And Carapaz is gonna need to attack to win La Vuelta anywayI can't see Ineos' logic behind wasting a rider on this hill. Froome is fried.
And for Movistar effort today)Soler's paying for yesterday's effort...
You cant attack always, but the man is usually an agressive riderCarapaz is wonderfully aggressive when he doesn't attack yesterday despite needing to take time
Roglic on the other hand should get mountains of criticism when he doesn't attack because he has the time trial in hand.
Just hope Roglic doesn't have a mishap during the ITT that causes him to lose time. He may regret not gaining more just in case.Carapaz is wonderfully aggressive when he doesn't attack yesterday despite needing to take time
Roglic on the other hand should get mountains of criticism when he doesn't attack because he has the time trial in hand.
Because yesterday was totally the rule rather than the exception while he was surrounded by 5 soft pedalling jumbots...Carapaz is wonderfully aggressive when he doesn't attack yesterday despite needing to take time
Roglic on the other hand should get mountains of criticism when he doesn't attack because he has the time trial in hand.
He just needs to transfer the bad descending to a teammate, like Pinot did with Reichenbach.I think Martin should ask Pinot for the number of that formula 1 training.
I'm thinking Carapaz. Although if they look at eXh other, could see someone like Vlasov or Poels attack and not be followedAnglirus coming, whos winning?
Anglirus coming, whos winning?