The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You say even the ITT couldn't save him, as if it isn't already a gift for the pure climbers that the only TT in the entire race finished on a 2km @ 14% climb.Same here. Roglic must be the most boring GT winner of the current generation. Follow the train, attack final 400m for boniseconds, rinse, repeat, wait for ITT.
Roglic won the Vuelta thanks to boniseconds. Take all boni's away and even the ITT couldn't save him.
you better tell that to all the teams, cause I guess they dont know it yetMore often than not he shows that he fades in the last week of grand tours.
Any of them could've been exciting winners if they'd made the difference themselves. Instead Kelderman got his ass dragged up to Piancavallo, Hindley then got dragged up to Lagi di Cancano, and TGH never really had to to much himself except sit on Dennis.Yeah, Kelderman or Hindley winning would have been much more exciting?
Those were definitely two exhilarating kilometers. The exception proves the rule.
Roglic in his last four grand tours: 2019 Giro, placed 3rd; 2019 Vuelta, placed first; 2020 TDF, placed second; 2020 Vuelta, placed first. So, in his last 4 grand tours, he's podiumed all of them, won 2, finished 2nd, and finished 3rd. . . . Clear signs of a weak final week rider.you better tell that to all the teams, cause I guess they dont know it yet
Yes, but Movistar action was the last bullet that killed himIneos did more harm to Carapaz than Unzue's boys. They denied him a Giro win and brought a Froome knife to a Jumbo gun fight.
Prime Purito with a good TT and his own Skytrain.Same here. Roglic must be the most boring GT winner of the current generation. Follow the train, attack final 400m for boniseconds, rinse, repeat, wait for ITT.
Roglic won the Vuelta thanks to boniseconds. Take all boni's away and even the ITT couldn't save him.
Movistar supported him at the Giro and he was supposed to lead them at the Vuelta, until he injured himself in a criterium that his team didn't want him riding in the first place. They might not have shown enormous trust in him but he seriously let them down in the Vuelta before jumping ship.I can understand Movistar is annoyed they were constantly getting marauded by Ineos, but Carapaz is a guy with a financially not brilliant or secure family background, so money might mean something different to him than for a slightly spoiled European, and also Movistar did not really show enormous trust in him, so I can understand his decision.
It's 100% a situation where Contador or Nibali would just attack balls deep themselves to find out how good Jumbo really is. If they're dissuaded by Bennet or Kuss that's on them lol.
Roglic has attacked this Vuelta when he had the legs to so. He attacked when he had the legs to do so in the Tour. He was by far the most aggressive GC rider in the 2018 Tour. People just overrate his climbing only to *** on him and his team.
His sprint yesterday and his Liege win make him more like prime Valverde than PuritoPrime Purito with a good TT and his own Skytrain.
There have been some cases where I he could've probably just dropped everyone solo, but you know those because when he takes off he immedaitelly takes a heap of time. Col de Portet in the Dauphine and Moncalvillo come to mind.Exactly. He rides to his strenghts. And that is a short burst of power at the end of the stage, on shorter very steep climbs and in the TTs. He is not the Contador/Froome type of climber where he would attack 10k to go on a MTF, drop everyone and just keep increasing the gap. When it comes to long, sustained climbing efforts there are people equal or better than him - especially when he is not in top form. He will always be better at the start of each week in a GT than at the end. He will always be better in shorter stages where the pace is easier in the first part. These are his strenghts and that is what get him wins.
So why would he race the way that does not suit his qualities? So some people could be more entertained? He is paid to win races. The team know what he is good at, they utilise that and more often than not, he deliveres.
No. Roglic is the winner because he's the fastest.Roglic is the winner, Carapaz is the fastest.
Yeah, for a while I thought that watching the ballot count would be more exciting than this raceCarapaz almost pulled it out with a late surge in the absentee ballots votes.
Dude is a national hero in Ecuador after the Giro, so probably a lot safer than most cyclists.I can understand Movistar is annoyed they were constantly getting marauded by Ineos, but Carapaz is a guy with a financially not brilliant or secure family background, so money might mean something different to him than for a slightly spoiled European, and also Movistar did not really show enormous trust in him, so I can understand his decision.
He's the winner according to the race rules.No. Roglic is the winner because he's the fastest.
His sprint yesterday and his Liege win make him more like prime Valverde than Purito
Yeah Roglic was actually the strongest in the Alps in my opinion. He was stronger than Pogacar on Loze and he was the strongest on Glieres imo. That TT from Pogacar just came out of nowhere.I'm sure Pogacar just dropped himself on Col de La Loze.
yeah pathetic, they just needed to give him one more climber and he would have finished it, kwiatkowski or Moscon would have been enoughIneos did more harm to Carapaz than Unzue's boys. They denied him a Giro win and brought a Froome knife to a Jumbo gun fight.