Drop back. Remco is going to need them.so what should the SQS riders cattaneo and Vervaeke do, continue to ride or let them get caught by the bunch?
They should have done it before but: let Cattaneo drop back. Keep Vervaeke in the front for now. Can help if Remco is in problems or as a jumping board or to take wind in the final 2kso what should the SQS riders cattaneo and Vervaeke do, continue to ride or let them get caught by the bunch?
I wonder how this would have gone with someone from Ineos in the front group. They played a really big role in the chase without seeming to play a big role in the gc. Perhaps they were the ones who made the difference between the break getting a genuinely dangerous lead and what we actually got.Man, no L'Aquila...
Cattaneo can let himself drop so he can just be with Remco before 5K. Vervaeke should try to connect with Remco somewhere between 3-2K from the finish in order to assist / be there if necessary in the last 2-3K.so what should the SQS riders cattaneo and Vervaeke do, continue to ride or let them get caught by the bunch?
If they had done that, I suppose Soudal and Movistar would have committed even more, but yeah, that would have been more dangerous for sure. But its pretty classic Ineos at this point I thinkI wonder how this would have gone with someone from Ineos in the front group. They played a really big role in the chase without seeming to play a big role in the gc. Perhaps they were the ones who made the difference between the break getting a genuinely dangerous lead and what we actually got.
That makes sense but loops back to the original question: what was the strategy behind having four strong riders in the break?Why would they want to waste any energy having to ride for someone in the red jersey that has no chance of wearing at the end of three weeks?
How much more resources did Soudal and Movistar have the ability to commit, though? Really only their riders in the break. And those can't compare to Ganna.If they had done that, I suppose Soudal and Movistar would have committed even more, but yeah, that would have been more dangerous for sure. But its pretty classic Ineos at this point I think
Giving Big Hugh free time going to come back around when he really gets cooking in week 3
He's also English, so 'cooking' probably amounts to warming up a can of baked beans in the microwave to put on his toast.There's a chance that will be happening back home in his kitchen after he's abandoned in week 2.
They used Kuss as bait to work over SQS helpers, and it worked pretty well. Who knows they will get a stage out of it, too.That makes sense but loops back to the original question: what was the strategy behind having four strong riders in the break?
He's also English, so 'cooking' probably amounts to warming up a can of baked beans in the microwave to put on his toast.
Do you think Ineos has resigned itself to not playing a role in the GC? Whether likely or not, I suspect they believe (or at least hope) both Thomas and Arensman will be heard from yet.I wonder how this would have gone with someone from Ineos in the front group. They played a really big role in the chase without seeming to play a big role in the gc. Perhaps they were the ones who made the difference between the break getting a genuinely dangerous lead and what we actually got.
Yes, thats why I said that the break obviously would be more dangerous if Arensman or Thomas joined itHow much more resources did Soudal and Movistar have the ability to commit, though? Really only their riders in the break. And those can't compare to Ganna.