- Mar 13, 2015
- 2,637
- 0
- 0
Re: Re:
Well to me they're pretty much equal. Dumoulin beat Malori in ONE long TT, and Malori beat him in 3 short ones, to me it looks equal. As long as Dumoulin doesn't start to beat Malori regularly, he is not better. Actually it's 11-5 in ITT wins for Malori, but that WC performance of Dumoulin brings back the balance.
Dekker_Tifosi said:ofcourse it does.Mr.White said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Malori doesn't beat Dumoulin in long flat itt's, maybe short ones. But that doesn't make him a better itt-er. More like a better prologue/short ITT specialist.
Next.
Doesn't make Dumoulin either
A time trial specialist, to me, is one who excels at longer time trials especially.
Malori is a decent ITT-er, but more a prologue specialist. Not the better time trialler
Well to me they're pretty much equal. Dumoulin beat Malori in ONE long TT, and Malori beat him in 3 short ones, to me it looks equal. As long as Dumoulin doesn't start to beat Malori regularly, he is not better. Actually it's 11-5 in ITT wins for Malori, but that WC performance of Dumoulin brings back the balance.