- Apr 8, 2010
- 1,257
- 0
- 0
Eshnar said:I assume those data refer to the audience peak.
How many viewers does Vuelta have, for istance, at 16 CET?
Zero, because there is no broadcast at that point in time?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Eshnar said:I assume those data refer to the audience peak.
How many viewers does Vuelta have, for istance, at 16 CET?
Magnus said:Zero, because there is no broadcast at that point in time?
gooner said:That was the summer when Florentino Perez went off on a mad one and bought Kaka, Ronaldo, Benzema, and Alonso. That why it was front page.
Eshnar said:
I could see Unipublic managers sad because they didn't get a sprint today.
Last year on Gardeccia the spanish TV commentator was saying something like "it's more exciting to see larger groups sprinting for the win rather than everyone by himself"
*facepalm*
They're trying a huge brainwash there in Spain. I'm really happy a truly epic stage has come out. Maybe 'casual fans' will notice how this is a million times better than uphill sprints.
The Hitch said:The stages when you switch on the tv and all the gaps are already made and all you are watching are the timechecks, arent that great either. The excitement is the attacks themselves and watching if they stick. I think most viewers will therefore probably have enjoyed Lagos Covadonga more than today where they switch on the tv and Contador has the race already won.
Yes, but the increased audience figures might mean they allot more time to it going forward, especially with a key race-making event happening outside of the broadcast events.Descender said:Don't troll, you know that is not true...
Besides, it's the broadcaster/organisers who are to blame for that, not the stage.
Yes, but that doesn't mean it doesn't get coverage. There's plenty of stuff about the stages, with climb profiles, interviews inside the péloton and full page spreads even in non-specialist papers, but it doesn't get the coverage the Giro or Tour do by a long shot. Also, the time of year doesn't help it of course, with August and September being early on in football season and with the transfer window closing partway through as well. However, there are some positives. For example, ETB have been broadcasting profiles of the coming day's racing in their main daily news program along with interviews and discussion, as a main story in the sports section.gooner said:On the Vuelta, I rememer Kelly and Harmon discussing this during last year's race and saying that the Vuelta does'nt get anywhere near the coverage in the sports papers like the Giro and the Tour do with Gazzetta and L'Equipe. Is this true?
Descender said:Don't troll, you know that is not true...
Besides, it's the broadcaster/organisers who are to blame for that, not the stage.
gooner said:That's Shamrock Rovers in our top league over here. That was the first game that Ronaldo and all the big signings were playing in a R.Madrid shirt in Dublin. I remember watching that game. That's why it got on the front page actually.
On the Vuelta, I rememer Kelly and Harmon discussing this during last year's race and saying that the Vuelta does'nt get anywhere near the coverage in the sports papers like the Giro and the Tour do with Gazzetta and L'Equipe. Is this true?
Cimber said:So far this year the grand 3 have been turned upside down. Imho for 2012:
Vuelta > Giro > Tour
hrotha said:I'll never understand how so many people can rate the 2012 Giro so highly.
hrotha said:I'll never understand how so many people can rate the 2012 Giro so highly.
The Hitch said:Yes i found something like Lagos de Covadonga or Zoncolan more interesting than say laquilla where i switched on the tv, watched a clock go from 15-10 minutes for half an hour, then got shown highlights of California for 10 minutes before the favorites went over the line. Had the stages been broadcast from the start maybe it would have been different, but they werent and all i saw was the broadcasters switching from 1 peloton to another.
thats my opinion. If you are going to call it trolling then it seems your not open to any discussion whatsoever.
Descender said:Is that referring to today's stage? Are you describing what we saw it as "broadcasters switching from one peloton to another"? Really??
I accused you of trolling because I (honestly) thought you were joking.
hrotha said:I'll never understand how so many people can rate the 2012 Giro so highly.
JRanton said:It ranks below this year's Tour in my opinion.
The Hitch said:So what is today's marca like?
Jason_Mercier said:I dont understand the people who says "Wow what an amazing Vuelta a España, the Vuelta **** the TDF, the Tour was so boring..." Guys, are you jocking? Did you see the stages of Belles Filles, Porrentruy or La Toussuire? Did you see it? Theres one stage of this Vuelta apart Fuente Dé that can beat the last two i have mentioned? Tell me one in this Vuelta better than the Porrentruy stage. A great day where all seen an amazing fight of a lot of kilometres to make the break away, an incredible demonstration of Kessiakoff and Pinot, battle of the GC guys the last 30 kms... The Toussuire day, a high level break away, a nice performance of Pierre Rolland, high rhytm in Madeleine and CDF, attacks of Van Garderen and Evans since 60 kms to go... then moves of Brajkovic, Nibali, Van Den Broeck and Pinot for more than 10 kms to the end, Froome dropping Wiggins, the battle Rolland-Kiserlovski... Then the Pyrinées were **** but the first two weeks in my opinion were better by far than the Vuelta. Other thing is that Contador be in. Only count the hours of show in the stages i have mentioned of the Tour and in the Vuelta stages. Sorry for my english.
Asturiano said:I'm not agree. The Tour was boring, this Vuelta is very fun.
Jason_Mercier said:I doubt that you saw all the stages of the TDF. If this Vuelta is " very fun" is because here is Alberto Contador. Nobody remember the 2011 and 2010 Vuelta a España, do you remember it? Only the freaks of cycling remember it. The only differece between those editions and the 2012 Vuelta is that here is Alberto Contador. All the Vuelta stages have offered us the same view, except Fuente De, why? Because of Alberto Contador. As i say the same view, 15 minutes of show in the final climbs, attacks in the last 5 kms, differences of 10 or 20 seconds... This is a nice GT? This is what they want the fans of cycling? Will you remenber any of this Vuelta apart the Fuente De stage? What? Tell me what, give me arguments. I'll remenber the Belles Filles stage as one of the best dominations of a team, the Porrentruys stage because of the Pinot's show, the born of a huge rider, i'll remember the Toussuire stage because of the demonstration of courage by Evans, the exhibition of Rolland, the attacks of Nibali and Van Den Broeck... What will do you remenber of this Vuelta? When Rodrìguez took 5" ahead Valverde or Contador in Jaca or Gallina?
Do you love cycling? Are you telling me that you prefer stages of 10 minutes of movements before hours of intensive riding as we saw in the stages i've mentioned? If the cycling fans prefer this the sport is on decline.