Dekker_Tifosi said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/preliminary-vuelta-a-espana-startlist-announced
Had to laugh about this article. Why the immense bias toward everything anglo-saxon?
Naming Danielson as one of the big favourites and not even mentioning the likes of Gesink, Fuglsang (who is Saxo Banks leader, not the Schlecks, they just came to prepare for the worlds) or Rodriguez.
Also I can't see how one good result in Burgos can make Danielson a sudden favourite again. It just doesn't add up compared to the other riders here. Sorry.
I've given up complaining about cyclingnews' Anglophone bias. I just try to ignore it nowadays.
It's hard, though, when it's such a huge bias.
When Bennati announced he was going to miss the Giro and the news was "Cavendish sprint rival to miss Giro" (that's an actual quote by the way) I seriously wanted to hit the screen.
The saddest part is that I don't think they realize how tremendously biased they are.
And while we're at it, indulge me and let me get the other complaint I have off my chest:
They never pay attention to their own past articles. Ever.
For example, it doesn't matter that a rider says a trillion times that he won't be at race X or that he'll be there but just ride it for training and is not in form to win.
It also doesn't matter that cyclingnews has reported that rider saying that quite a few times.
The reason it doesn't matter is because come race preview time, they'll list him as a major favorite, then dedicate a large portion of the race commentary and review to how the rider was a huge disappointment and has surely missed one of his big objectives.
Apologies for the rant