glassmoon said:
Kokoso said:
Lance Armstrong said:
If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.
Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.
So are you saying that it's right that Sagan replaced that two guys who are responsible for one Slovak place in MTB race? Mind you, without them Sagan couldn't race it.
Without preparation, Sagan is on the level of Skarnitzl (cze)
If that only was true...but Skarnitzl beat him. It's nothing more than speculation that Sagan is better than Lami. Wishful thinking of his fans. Lami probably is worse than Skarnitzl but maybe not that much. In 2014 Lami had more points, though I don't know races in detail . But whatever.
Is it fair? We could speculate. Is it against the rules? No.
I don't know if it's against the rules, I don't know Slovak qualyfing rules.But obviously it is not. My opinion on fair/not fair is clear, no speculation
]Other significant aspect is a huge PR boost for XCO/MTB which should be in the interest of all mtb riders (Lami including).
That's IMHO BS, Slovakia is not that big country to make huge PR boost and even if there is huge PR boost, that itself doesn't translate to bigger money or whatever. Sagan will have huge PR boost (already has), not MTB. I think this argument is made up to justify the unfairness you perceive.
Why it should be big interest of 29 years old Lami who maybe will have no chance to ride other Olympics or who's carreer might end any day - you never know - is beyond my comprehension.
With the OG it's not always about who gained the points during 2y qualification - it's often about who is the best option available.
That's a good point. It is valid for guys who actualy ARE doing that sport regularly and only get better than other guys from given country. But it is not valid for guys who actualy don't race that sport - and that's Sagan's case. Mind you it is only speculation that he would actually finished worse than Sagan. Sagan once crashed and once finished more than minute behind Skarnitzl (who had comfortable margin to second place so maybe didn't go full gas) - not exactly great. Something like that Lami might have achived too.