proffate said:I'm inclined to believe that's a little bit of an overestimate as the other GC guys weren't so far off Horner's pace. Isn't 6.7 completely out of line with what they've all been doing on the other stages?
Moose McKnuckles said:Wait, did Horner just do 6.7w/kg? Is that calculation real?
Netserk said:It's a short effort at low altitude, so it's not that surprising.
Bavarianrider said:7,1Watt/Kilo for Horner over 17 minutes. Not bad for the old guy![]()
goggalor said:The peloton appears to have gone full genius, and I believe the Clinic predicted this development after Belles Filles last year. Hate to bring up Sky, but seriously, much of the blame is on them. Racist cycling fans and journalists have their fair share as well.
goggalor said:The peloton appears to have gone full genius, and I believe the Clinic predicted this development after Belles Filles last year. Hate to bring up Sky, but seriously, much of the blame is on them. Racist cycling fans and journalists have their fair share as well.
del1962 said:I say we burn an image of Churchill
GuyIncognito said:There's the problem with most analysis of w/kg: You must take into account duration which a lot don't do. This was a 15 minute effort, it's about equivalent to 6w/kg over a 30km climb.
Bernie's eyesore said:If the peloton has gone full genius how on earth can a 41 year old who has never finished top 8 in a Grand Tour before crush everyone like that? Makes no sense whatsoever.
Bavarianrider said:Vayer reacts!
En 16'43sec Horner bat le record de la montée de plus de 15sec!!! Watts mutants. AMAZING!
Froome et Cobo en 2011: 17min16s, 473 watts étalon. Horner 16min 44!!!
proffate said:CP15 is pretty close to an FTP effort (~93%), and this is at the end of a long stage at the tail end of a hard GT, so his performance should be sub-optimal, i.e. closer to actual FTP.
I have no idea what you mean by a 30km climb, is that 30km of 15% which takes 2 hours to complete or 30km at 4% which takes one hour? How did you come to the conclusion of equivalency to 6 w/kg?
EnacheV said:And isnt Nibali also beating that record to? Was 25 secs behind Horner
There's a thread dedicated to Nibali here in the clinic, where his performances can be discussed. This thread is about Horner.EnacheV said:Vayer the pilar of morality and scientific perfection. To bad nobody takes him seriously except a little group of extreme haters.
And isnt Nibali also beating that record to? Was 25 secs behind Horner
MUTANT OMG
but wait, Nibali has panache
smart and calm people would think that it has to do more with climatic conditions at the race day, when a mediocre Nibali beats Froome/Cobo time
also, this is proof that climbing times are irrelevant
Bernie's eyesore said:If the peloton has gone full genius how on earth can a 41 year old who has never finished top 8 in a Grand Tour before crush everyone like that? Makes no sense whatsoever.
proffate said:I'm inclined to believe that's a little bit of an overestimate as the other GC guys weren't so far off Horner's pace. Isn't 6.7 completely out of line with what they've all been doing on the other stages?
Bavarianrider said:Vayer reacts!
En 16'43sec Horner bat le record de la montée de plus de 15sec!!! Watts mutants. AMAZING!
Froome et Cobo en 2011: 17min16s, 473 watts étalon. Horner 16min 44!!!
alphabet said:no, nibali finished 9 seconds behind the (previous) record ascent.
BroDeal said:It makes as much sense as a sh!t rider who his own team manager rated as the worse on the team suddenly coming in second at the Vuelta. Actually it makes a lot more sense since Horner could always climb well. He was not paperboying up climbs or holding onto motorcycles to get to the top.
EnacheV said:16'44" +25" = 17'09" < 17'16"