Ikbengodniet said:
Bardamu said:
Ikbengodniet said:
Durden93 said:
I find it hard to understand how the Ardennes triple could be rated more highly than Roubaix-Flanders+ WC
Roubaix> Liege
Worlds> Amstel
Flanders> Fleche
I get that doing those 3 in a row is impressive, but there's just one week between Roubaix and Flanders. I know that Gilbert had other wins, but so did Boonen (E3). I think if Boonen's season was more recent it'd be much more highly regarded.
I think this is not even a contest. I would rate Roubaix, Flanders and Liege even, but are far more prestigious than Fleche at the moment and to even try compare WC and Amstel is lunatic. On top of that Boonen won 2 tour stages. Every rider will choose Boonen's 2005 above Gilbert 2011 immediately.
as a non sprinter Gilbert won 19 races that year. You are forgetting he won stages in the tirreno, tdf, eneco tour, tour of belgium, that he won Strade Bianche, San Sebastian, Brabantse Pijl, Belgian RR & TT and GP Quebec as well. I have not seen dominance like Gilbert 2011 in this century. Gilbert won them all by being the strongest. Gilbert was a force to be reckoned with in every race he entered. Boonen not so much, despite that triple being impressive.
In my opinion it shouldn't make a difference if the rider is a sprinter or not. I know Gilbert won al those 2nd tier classics and some stages but so did Boonen in 2005. Still his results in the biggest races of the season are better.
Reminds me of Mollema this tour who immediately chose his tour stage above his CSS win last year.
Strade Bianche that year was a 1.1 race and can't be compared to the prestige it now has.
Common sense as well?
I don't think so.
If a sprinter wins 10-15 races, that's not something extraordinary. But if a classic specialist, puncheur, wins it, that's huge. Take this year's Tour as an example. Kittel won 5 stages, and had an opportunity in at least 3-4 more. And how many opportunities had classic specialists, or climbers? 2-3 at most. That's a huge disadvantage already. It's the same in other stage races. Sprinters always have advantage when it comes to number of stages suited for them. It's not coincidence then that sprinters have highest number of wins in current peloton, Cavendish and Greipel have 140-150 wins on their palmares. Gilbert has around 70, Van Avermaet only 30, Kwiatkowski even less. Freaking Cancellara had around 90, including many TT's. Only freaks of nature like Sagan or Valverde can come close to sprinters, cause they win everywhere. Even Boonen himself said about Valverde how unbelievable thing is that he can win 15 races a year, while not being a sprinter!