Good morning.
I'd like to ask you what do you think about Pogacar and Vingegaard. Who do you think is the better cyclist?
Pogacar is for sure more versatile, but is he also a better cyclist? Or Vingegaard is better, and Pogacar is only more versatile?
I started this thread because in an other forum a user has written: "Pogacar is more versatile, but Vingegaard is better because he has beaten him twice at TDF, and considering that TDF is the most important race;". So he stated that the top/best GC rider should be also considered the best cyclist in the world, although he doesn't win Classics, do you agree with that statement? He said that the fact that Pogacar wins monuments is insignificant in comparison to win GC, and in particular TDF, so he is not as good as Vingegaard.
Thank you very much
I'd like to ask you what do you think about Pogacar and Vingegaard. Who do you think is the better cyclist?
Pogacar is for sure more versatile, but is he also a better cyclist? Or Vingegaard is better, and Pogacar is only more versatile?
I started this thread because in an other forum a user has written: "Pogacar is more versatile, but Vingegaard is better because he has beaten him twice at TDF, and considering that TDF is the most important race;". So he stated that the top/best GC rider should be also considered the best cyclist in the world, although he doesn't win Classics, do you agree with that statement? He said that the fact that Pogacar wins monuments is insignificant in comparison to win GC, and in particular TDF, so he is not as good as Vingegaard.
Thank you very much