Yes, because they're already advantaged enough by being the strongest. The whole point of Classics-style racing is it's supposed to be hard to control. You have to be smart as well as be strong. Well, you can just be super strong, like Cancellara in 2010, but there are still opportunities for those that race smart. And if you're not the strongest on the day, then you should either be trying to do something with it, or sifted from the bunch so that the leaders have to work for themselves. While the decisive moves may typically have been made on the Muur, typically we had a much smaller group by the time we got there than we had with 20km to go today. Hell, before we got onto the final lap there was still a group of around 50 riders. Sitting in, not putting your nose in the wind once, making sure you're not placed TOO badly on the final lap and race for a good placement... it's not meant to be what the Classics are about.
Also, Molenberg, Taaienberg, Eikenberg, Berendries... these are big and historic climbs. They are totally wasted as one-pass-in-the-first-half-of-the-race climbs. They would be wasted in that spot anyway but when they do circuits so everybody's getting a look at conditions first before doing a last-lap-only attack plan, it's a total joke. You get more kilometres of action at Ardennes Classics sometimes.