Who will be caught first ? Froome vs Contador

Who will be caught for doping first?

  • They will never catch any of them

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
There is a lot of tension and stress for results right now.

With the new Henao problems added to the "win at all cost" Tinkoff mentality i'm curious who do you think will be caught first.

I'm not interested about who do you think is doping or not.

Only who do you think will fail first.
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
I think Contador and Riis are more experienced. A minus is Tinkoff pressure and mouth.

On the other hand it seems something shaky is going on at Sky.

I believe chances are greater for Froome
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
the sceptic said:
a better thread title would have been "is the sky empire falling apart"

why don't you make it? instead of posting garbage about how you have a crystal ball knowing people's intention over the internet.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
EnacheV said:
I think Contador and Riis are more experienced. A minus is Tinkoff pressure and mouth.

On the other hand it seems something shaky is going on at Sky.

I believe chances are greater for Froome

You think Froome will get caught, even though you think he is clean?

How does that work?
 
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
the sceptic said:
You think Froome will get caught, even though you think he is clean?

How does that work?

La Gazzetta dello Sport and the other tabloids will bring him down:D
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
the sceptic said:
You think Froome will get caught, even though you think he is clean?

How does that work?

I don't think he is clean, or doped, i won't put my hand in fire for any of the sides. I just find laughable/ridiculous the "evidences" brought by his accusers, always amusing to combat.

I would assume that they both are doppers as the most likely to be true situation.
 
Jun 16, 2009
1,429
1
10,485
Froome / Brailsford might just be getting too cocky. But they have the science to keep one step ahead and being partnered with the British Federation can't hurt.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Froome's got protection. He'll get busted eventually but it will take at least 5 years (god I hope I'm wrong)
 
Oct 16, 2012
10,364
179
22,680
Lets wait and see what Bruyneel has to say, can Contador survive any accusations that Bruyneel might have to say?
 
Jun 16, 2010
1,458
0
10,480
EnacheV said:
There is a lot of tension and stress for results right now.

With the new Henao problems added to the "win at all cost" Tinkoff mentality i'm curious who do you think will be caught first.

I'm not interested about who do you think is doping or not.

Only who do you think will fail first.

And how often do you beat your wife.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,871
1,279
20,680
EnacheV said:
I don't think he is clean, or doped, i won't put my hand in fire for any of the sides. I just find laughable/ridiculous the "evidences" brought by his accusers, always amusing to combat.

I would assume that they both are doppers as the most likely to be true situation.

Ah, I got it. So you are just arguing for the sake of it. Now what's that called............:rolleyes:
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,230
2,615
28,180
If Sky (the sponsor) drops out of the sport, Froome will pop soon after imo.
If UCI is serious about changing the anti doping element of the sport, both will pop with short notice within a short space of time.
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
del1962 said:
Lets wait and see what Bruyneel has to say, can Contador survive any accusations that Bruyneel might have to say?

is there anything that Bruyneel can say to make Contador serve a 2nd retroactive ban and be completely bye bye ?

i don't think that's possible, it may be affect Contador's reputation but that's about all he can do.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
EnacheV said:
is there anything that Bruyneel can say to make Contador serve a 2nd retroactive ban and be completely bye bye ?

i don't think that's possible, it may be affect Contador's reputation but that's about all he can do.

He would lose all his wins from 2007 to 2009 though.
 
Oct 16, 2012
10,364
179
22,680
EnacheV said:
is there anything that Bruyneel can say to make Contador serve a 2nd retroactive ban and be completely bye bye ?

i don't think that's possible, it may be affect Contador's reputation but that's about all he can do.

I guess it depends if an anti-doping authority takes it up and what the evidence is like, we will see what Bruyneel has to say first though, he may have other targets.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
I'm gonna say they both test positive and are caught the day after going head to head on Hautacam in an epic Tour deciding battle. I predict 8.0 W/Km. :cool:
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
Imagine if one of the Sky doms gets caught and therefore Froome has to tone it down massively and then his results crash back down to 'normal' levels. It must probably won't happen though. Can't see Froome testing positive but then all of the other major riders who have ever tested positive has always been a a big shock.
Not a shock that they were doping but a shock that they got caught/tested positive.
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
If Contador gets busted this year it would have a massive implication on Sky. As in why would Contador need to dope to beat a clean Froome. Even the biggest Armstrong believers stopped believing when loads of his rivals/team-mates got busted.
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
DirtyWorks said:
Jonathan Tiernan Locke??

Was there ever a completed sanction against JTL?

I was thinking along the lines of one of the GT doms. JTL never really road for Froome/Wiggins did he not in the mode of Rogers/Kennaugh/Thomas etc.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,622
8,498
28,180
SundayRider said:
If Contador gets busted this year it would have a massive implication on Sky. As in why would Contador need to dope to beat a clean Froome. Even the biggest Armstrong believers stopped believing when loads of his rivals/team-mates got busted.

Brailsford tells us that clean riders will soon be beating doped times. Some people are just going to accept that without thinking terribly hard about it.