ElChingon said:So its not 110K of TT's this year, who was saying that... errr....errr...
I think the correct number is 101 kilometers actually
ElChingon said:So its not 110K of TT's this year, who was saying that... errr....errr...
Fetisoff said:I think the correct number is 101 kilometers actually
ElChingon said:Please send Steephill the memo, I can only fix my post, but not till I find a better source.
Fetisoff said:I think the correct number is 101 kilometers actually
ElChingon said:Yea, 2011 had 41K's and now its 101.4K's, the Schlecks are hosed!
karlboss said:No way, they just have to race. To me it is their form that suggests they are toast. Even if Shcleck loses 5 minutes in the TTs there are the stages to make it back.
EDIT: before I'm flamed Schleck is not my favourite, but he will be on the podium
ElChingon said:That is what they assumed last year and the last TT was not as long as it will be this year. If they race just as conservatively they're hosed, i.e. not attack and not gain major time on the mountain stages. If any decent TT GC rider is within 2 minutes of the Schlecks they're just not going to win it (the Schlecks).
Gubby Allen said:I can't see anything beyond Wiggins or Evans, could see them 3-4 mins clear. Unless any of the others have improved their TTs that much. I could see JVB going top 5 but neither Schleck that high. Valerde, Leiphimer, Froome, Cobo may all finish higher than Martin, Ryder, Frank and Menchov.
Where are the profiles?Bavarianrider said:No that all profiles are out, i think no one can really complain about this route. Many very intersting stages.
Eshnar said:Where are the profiles?
Am I the only one who sees really few chances for climbers?Bavarianrider said:Actually this is quiet a fantastic route.
It offers really a few stages for all type of riders.
TTlers, Sprinters, Puncheurs, Climbers, Classics Riders.
If it had a cobbled stage it would be perfect.
There are chances for climbers to attack, but if the peloton doesn't want to see them succeed it will be hard. What the course seriously lacks is a finish on an HC col, even if Wiggins gets dropped on the slopes of the Croix de Fer or something his Sky train can bring him back for La Toussuire, where no one will drop him.Eshnar said:Am I the only one who sees really few chances for climbers?
As for classic riders, I see only stage 4.
Eshnar said:Am I the only one who sees really few chances for climbers?
As for classic riders, I see only stage 4.
Bavarianrider said:- 3 TTlers stages
- 2 Uphill Finishes for Puncheurs ok
- 1 Ardennes Type Classic Stage which one? Porrentruy?
- Stage 4: a chance for classic riders if the really try ok
- 3 Mountain Finishes for Climbers which ones exactly?
- The Grand Colombier Stage. A stage for a climbers who are willing to take risks. Grand Colombier is a really difficult mountain agreed, and I add I really like this stage
- Foix Stage: Offers a chance to drop weaker climbers hell no
- 6 stages for a sprint royal chance. fine
Really this is by far the most balanced route in years.
Bavarianrider said:- 3 TTlers stages
- 2 Uphill Finishes for Puncheurs
- 1 Ardennes Type Classic Stage
- Stage 4: a chance for classic riders if the really try
- 3 Mountain Finishes for Climbers
- The Grand Colombier Stage. A stage for a climbers who are willing to take risks. Grand Colombier is a really difficult mountain
- Foix Stage: Offers a chance to drop weaker climbers
- 6 stages for a sprint royal chance.
Really this is by far the most balanced route in years.
roundabout said:Still looks as **** as it was in October. Maybe even slightly worse.
Bavarianrider said:If you want to see 10 Mountainfinishes wait for the Vuelta.
But this comes close to what a GT should look like.
And it's a bit different than what we usually see., too.
