So? Poels isn’t going to win the Vuelta, any more than Porte is going to win the Tour.Of course Ineos waited until after the poll creation to change its line-up, so Poels isn't in the poll.
I'm going with a "head" candidate and several "heart" candidates. I picked Carapaz, simply because he can hold his own in the TT but is the best climber in the field, based on his Giro performance.
My "heart" candidates are Roglic, Lopez and Quintana. Having said that, I think any of the listed riders can win, except for Valverde.
There seems to be a groundswell of consensus growing around Roglic, but tbh I think Carapaz can take minutes from him on the final finishing ramps in Stages 7 and 13, and maybe stage 5 too. Of course, he'll need those minutes, as I expect JV to take at least 1:30 from Movistar in the opening TTT and Roglic to take another 2 mintues in the ITT, if not more in both...at the end of the Giro it still looked to me like Carapaz had more in the tank whereas Roglic was emptied. Of course that was months ago.
I'm going with a "head" candidate and several "heart" candidates. I picked Carapaz, simply because he can hold his own in the TT but is the best climber in the field, based on his Giro performance.
My "heart" candidates are Roglic, Lopez and Quintana. Having said that, I think any of the listed riders can win, except for Valverde.
There seems to be a groundswell of consensus growing around Roglic, but tbh I think Carapaz can take minutes from him on the final finishing ramps in Stages 7 and 13, and maybe stage 5 too. Of course, he'll need those minutes, as I expect JV to take at least 1:30 from Movistar in the opening TTT and Roglic to take another 2 mintues in the ITT, if not more in both...at the end of the Giro it still looked to me like Carapaz had more in the tank whereas Roglic was emptied. Of course that was months ago.
Yeah, gotta be rational hereValverde.
I mean, seriously, who else?
Exactly, I dont respect anyone who is just going of feelings and all that. Gotta take a scientific approach and tests I ran suggested that none other than Valverde would even stand a chance.Yeah, gotta be rational here![]()
Exactly, I dont respect anyone who is just going of feelings and all that. Gotta take a scientific approach and tests I ran suggested that none other than Valverde would even stand a chance.
No way is any team of importance losing 1:30 in 13,4 km TTT. If the difference is any more than 30 seconds I would be surprised. On the ITT 2 minutes is about correct I think. But in the end the climbing form will matter. If both are climbing like "third week Giro" then Carapaz wins. Or Lopez. If Roglič climbs like he did at the begining of the season or third week of the Tour last year (plus most of the 2018 season really) then he wins. Very simple.
He has to come back from far, altough his 14th place in the Tour was a step in the right direction.No one has faith in Fabio Aru?
He was never even in the lead last year... How can he be "a couple of stages away from winning" if that's the case? With this logic applied you could argue that Krujswijk was a couple of stages away from winning the Tour this year. Alaphilippe (Tour 19), Voeckler (Tour 12) or Krujswijk (Giro 16) being a couple of stages away from winning in the respective Grand Tours would be much more reasonable statements to make.He was a couple of stages from winning last year and the race suits him better this year + in the Tour he showed he has still got it.
People have kept saying thrughout the last many years that Valverde is not a GC candidate, yet he rides GC much more successfully than most others.
Except from the guys that actually win GC and most of the top 10 that can beat himHe was a couple of stages from winning last year and the race suits him better this year + in the Tour he showed he has still got it.
People have kept saying thrughout the last many years that Valverde is not a GC candidate, yet he rides GC much more successfully than most others.
Except from the guys that actually win GC and most of the top 10 that can beat him
Yeah, but he was flying through the spring before the Giro. I mean seriously flying. So the fade was always on the cards for this reason - many suspected it.Two very dissimilar situations, if you ask me.
As far as I am concerned, Yates out-raced himself in the beginning of last year's Giro. Meanwhile, Roglic rode defensively throughout the entire Giro, but just faded in the last week of the race (the reasons for him fading could be many things but it certainly was not because he made the same errors as Yates did the year before).