ThisFrenchGuy said:
Wasn't Thorpe a "kickstart" for swimming? A successful athlete will often fill up the clubs and raise the talent pool available for its federation.
You need to put him on a bike.
No - Thorpe was a product of the swimming culture in Australia, not the other way around.
I actually find sporting success on a national level a very interesting topic, being Australian and having lived in the USA and Canada (and England very briefly). IMO, there are freaks out there that are going to be champions no matter who much or little support they get. Ian Thorpe and Michael Phelps, Mark Cavendish, a number of cricketers, etc.
But the real difference lies in grass roots support and being involved in a sport from an early age and then having the infrastructure to support the development of individuals as they progress. This includes football, rugby, cricket, soccer and swimming in Australia (also athletics, but we're not so good at this on the international scene); hockey in Canada; basketball, baseball and football in the USA. I am less familiar with the USA, so forgive me if the likes of swimming is widely practiced by school children.
In Australia in the 80s and 90s, we excelled in a number of sports because we had infrastructure to support the development of talented athletes. This is particularly true of cycling (especially track), cricket and swimming. This gave us an advantage over other countries because they did not have this support network to develop their sports people. Great Britain, having seen the success of this model, then developed similar policies and infrastructure. The benefits of this can be seen in sports like cycling and cricket where they have adopted this model and are now very successful.
With this in mind, I am always amazed at the level of support and infrastructure for sports in Canada because it really doesn't exist for anything but hockey. When I was growing up, Canada was a powerhouse in swimming and athletics because of good infrastructure and government support. But they lost the government support and swimming pools were ripped up a long time ago. In Australia, there are 50 m swimming pools everywhere: most schools, nearly every country town, and readily accessible in cities (the closest one to me in Melbourne has three 50 m pools, two outside and one inside). However, there is only one 50 m pool in Ottawa, Canada's national capital, and this is not public and is only available for one or two afternoons a week. The same is true for most other sports.
For sports in general to be successful, beyond talented and determined individuals, then getting children involved from an early age and supporting their endeavours as they develop with infrastructure and sound coaching and nutritional advice is essential.
I know this is one hell of a tangent, but Great Britain copied the Australian Academy concept and hence the current success of British cycling is in part due to Australians anyway!